Why would Fiddaman "review" a completed blog designed and designated as a visual aide in raising awareness of SSRI, SNRI prescriptions escalating at an adjusted median 1,74 million per annum in the UK
and the unscrupulous activities of the Government, MHRA and NICE in using UK Government investigation reports to facilitate net drug cost reductions from £355 million to £195 million in four years,
whilst letting a situation akin to the Benzodiazepine debacle continue...
who would turn two mentions of the words "adverse drug reactions (ADRs), side effects and withdrawal problems"
"Thursday, 7 May 2009
http://tuesday1st.blogspot.com/2009/05/doh-1998-2008-england-ssri-snri_2963.html
apart from a fantasist and liar like Bob Fiddaman...
who has made great issue of his struggles with the MHRA and UK Government officials, a person who is definitely not a "patient advocate" speaking out for all those affected by all SSRI, SNRIs and
who has since spent almost two years stalking, harassing and writing malicious communications about the blogs author because the UK Government statistics, not the author, undermined the UK Seroxat Litigation, in which he was a litigant, and his own financial and ego driven agenda.
Whether he is a self serving loose cannon or a useful tool of the Scientology linked UK Seroxat Litigation Lawyer, the CCHR who have given him a Human Rights Award for as yet unspecified activities or Scientology itself, has yet to be definitively confirmed.
Please note: Tuesday1st had read the minutes of Bob Fiddamans meeting with the MHRA --a fact he was well aware of-- and had personally thanked Bob Fiddaman for widening the issue on the Mental Magazine group September 11th 2008 Re: Meeting with MHRA which is in the thread started by self-promoting Bob Fiddaman, found here
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/mentalmagazine/message/12405
who would turn two mentions of the words "adverse drug reactions (ADRs), side effects and withdrawal problems"
from this
"Thursday, 7 May 2009
"The increase in the marginal trend reversal of Paroxetine"
"Total Prescriptions in 2002 correlates with: -
3 UK – The Observer February 3, 2002 article “Hard habit to break”, Mark Harvey, of Hugh James Solicitors, Cardiff; instigates further publicity of the adverse drug reactions (ADRs), side effects and withdrawal problems, connected with the Seroxat --- but common to all drugs in the SSRI / SNRI class."
"Significantly, the parliamentary interest and media coverage given to Seroxat and the continuing down trend in Paroxetine prescriptions has had NO impact on the overall marginal trend increases in prescription numbers for the drug class, although ALL are affected by the same ADRs, side effects and withdrawal problems."
into this
"New Blog from 'Anti-Seroxat Litigation Campaigner'
It seems the purpose of the following blog I am about to review is to show how Seroxat isn't the worst SSRi to taper from and, it seems, to show, how other SSRi's have a higher rate of withdrawal problems.
The author, 'Tuesday1st' [That's the name she chooses to go by] highlights that there are many dangers with a whole class of SSRi's, I think she assumes that I don't know this as she, has in the past, accused me of focusing on a single issue [that being Seroxat] - she may once again wish to read the minutes from the meeting I had with the MHRA and may also like to learn that I have another meeting pencilled in to discuss patient involvement with the MHRA."
apart from a fantasist and liar like Bob Fiddaman...
who has made great issue of his struggles with the MHRA and UK Government officials, a person who is definitely not a "patient advocate" speaking out for all those affected by all SSRI, SNRIs and
who has since spent almost two years stalking, harassing and writing malicious communications about the blogs author because the UK Government statistics, not the author, undermined the UK Seroxat Litigation, in which he was a litigant, and his own financial and ego driven agenda.
Whether he is a self serving loose cannon or a useful tool of the Scientology linked UK Seroxat Litigation Lawyer, the CCHR who have given him a Human Rights Award for as yet unspecified activities or Scientology itself, has yet to be definitively confirmed.
Please note: Tuesday1st had read the minutes of Bob Fiddamans meeting with the MHRA --a fact he was well aware of-- and had personally thanked Bob Fiddaman for widening the issue on the Mental Magazine group September 11th 2008 Re: Meeting with MHRA which is in the thread started by self-promoting Bob Fiddaman, found here
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/mentalmagazine/message/12405
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.