blogs created to prevent or detect a crime http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1997/ukpga_19970040_en_1

This blog is brougt to you consistent with subsection 3 of the Protection from Harassment Act - i.e. blogs created to prevent or detect a crime http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1997/ukpga_19970040_en_1



Friday, 31 July 2009

Scientology sponsors Fiddaman Seroxat Blog

Click image to enlarge - Fiddaman blog bought by Scientology !


Robert Douglas Michael Fiddaman - 31 July 1964


Happy birthday Fido - from all the team here at Bob Fiddaman Blog

Tuesday, 28 July 2009

Efexor has more than twice the total signatures of Seroxat petition

Efexor has more than twice the total signatures of Seroxat petition

source - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/uksurvivors/message/46463

http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?effexor = 20698

http://truthman30.wordpress.com/2009/07/28/the-seroxatpaxil-online-petition-tips-over-the-10000-mark/

ephesians 6:11 to 6:17 - for Dawn Rider, a mother who lost her son Kevin Neil Rider June 3, 2000

ephesians 6 :11 to 6 : 17

6:11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.
6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
6:13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.
6:14 Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness;
6:15 And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace;
6:16 Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked.
6:17 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:

Seroxat/Paxil Online Petition Tips Over The 10,000 Mark - but Prozac petition is well over 21000 +

http://www.petitiononline.com/lilpro/


More links back to the Scientology financed Fiddaman blog


Monday, 27 July 2009

Seroxat yellow cards rose by 61% after Panorama - yeah made their own!

Seroxat yellow cards rose by 61% after Panorama - yeah made their own!

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/uksurvivors/message/46433

extract - from Seroxat NewsletterBBC Panorama is planning to broadcast a follow up to the `Secrets of Seroxat' documentary in May. Many of you who contacted the programme will have been asked by the producer to fill in a special version of the Yellow Card designed for Panorama by MIND. The Yellow Card system is used by GPs to report drug safety issues to the Medicine's Control Agency. If your GP has not already filled in a Yellow Card about Seroxat, please ask them to do so.see full document here

http://www.seroxatusergroup.org.UK/Documents/newsletter2.doc

Research links Panorama investigations to rise in adverse drug reports by UK doctors

http://www.bjcp-journal.com/pdfs/pressrelease_panorama_and_paroxetine_feb2006.pdf

PRESS RELEASE
Monday 13 February 2006
Research links Panorama investigations
to rise in adverse drug reports by UK doctors
The number of adverse reactions reported by UK doctors to the antidepressant paroxetine – often know by its brand name Seroxat - rose by 61 per cent after three editions of the BBC's award-winning current affairs programme Panorama explored increasing concerns about the drug.
Research just published in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology shows a sudden increase in reports immediately after each of the three programmes were aired in the UK in October 2002, May 2003 and October 2004.
Five regulatory announcements made in the UK during the same period resulted in a much smaller five per cent increase in reports of adverse reactions.
The research team from the Department of Social Medicine at Bristol University, UK, explored prescribing patterns and adverse drug reports for paroxetine, which is part of a group of drugs called SSRIs (selective serotonine reuptake inhibitors).
"Our analysis of adverse drug reports made by doctors suggests that negative publicity, particularly the three Panorama programmes, were associated with marked, short-term peaks in reporting" says lead author Dr Richard Martin.
"In the months before and after the three Panorama programmes were aired adverse reports went up from 8.3 to 13.4 per 100,000 prescriptions. The change before and after regulatory announcements went from 7.6 to 8.0."
SSRI's are used to treat patients with depression. They work by raising levels of the important chemical serotonin which helps to regulate communications (electrical activity) in the regions of the brain thought to be affected by depression.
The initial Panorama programme followed two announcements by the US Food and Drug Administration. The first announcement, in January 2002, warned of severe withdrawal symptoms from paroxetine and the second, in October 2002, suggested links between the drug and suicidal behaviour.
"Overall prescribing of paroxetine started to fall gradually after the FDA's warning was publicised in the UK" adds Dr Martin. "Prescribing patterns were not as obviously affected by media attention and regulatory announcements as the reporting of adverse drug reactions, but they may have helped to maintain the decline."

New Fiddaman blog - "CYP2D6 and Paroxetine" - sopnsored by Scientology / CCHR


Harvey's client can't claim compensation for Seroxat caused violence

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/uksurvivors/message/46420


Solicitor Mark Harvey said: "All the claimants allege they tried to withdraw from Seroxat and have suffered discontinuation syndrome."
Dorey cannot claim compensation from GSK through alleging Seroxat led to a state of mind that caused him to kill his wife because a criminal act cannot be the basis for such a claim.
Since it was first prescribed in 1990, Seroxat has been linked to at least 50 suicides. http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23433242-details/Maker+of+

uksurvivors : Message: Seroxat clients not addicted - they had "discontinuation syndrome"

uksurvivors : Message: Seroxat clients not addicted - they had "discontinuation syndrome": "Seroxat clients not addicted - they had 'discontinuation syndrome'




His claim is part of a £30million damages case against the makers of the drug, which is supposed to boost confidence and happiness.
Law firm Hugh James, on behalf of the claimants, alleges Seroxat is 'defective' under the 1987 Consumer Protection Act.
Solicitor Mark Harvey said: 'All the claimants allege they tried to withdraw from Seroxat and have suffered discontinuation syndrome.'

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23433242-details/Maker+of+'happy+pill'+Seroxat+is+sued+by+man+who+killed+wife+while+on+drug/article.do"

uksurvivors : Message: Seroxat case has less than 500 clients - reports Daily Mail

uksurvivors : Message: Seroxat case has less than 500 clients - reports Daily Mail: "Seroxat case has less than 500 clients - reports Daily Mail"

New Fiddaman blog - "CYP2D6 and Paroxetine" - but NO mention of other brands of SSRI's


Friday, 24 July 2009

Seroxat withdrawal plan formulated by Dr Healy & C.I.T.A. as early as 2002 - yet Fiddaman ignored it, why?


Drug withdrawal plan formulated
From the Northern Echo, first published Saturday 4th Jan 2003.
A CHARITY has developed an action plan to help people suffering withdrawal from the anti-depressant drug Seroxat.
Thousands of users of Seroxat, including many in the North-East and North Yorkshire, have reported withdrawal effects, from head pains to suicidal tendencies.
Some users say it has taken them years to come off the drug, which is manufactured by pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and, in desperation, have developed their own withdrawal plans.
But the Council for Involuntary Tranquilliser Addiction (CITA), in Liverpool, says it has developed a number of safe withdrawal programmes in conjunction with Dr David Healy, director of the North Wales department of psychological medicine, at the University of Wales.
The programmes include switching from Seroxat to Prozac or using the herbal remedy St John's Wort.
Pam Armstrong, a CITA advisor, said reducing dosages before switching to Prozac had proved the most successful.
She said: "Sometimes they work very well for people but, to me, it is against the objective if you cannot get off it."
More than 4,000 people, who are demanding a change in literature which says the drug is non-addictive, are considering a joint legal bid against GSK.
But the company maintains that there is no scientific evidence that use of the drug leads to addiction.
A working party, which includes the Department of Health's executive body, the Medicines Control Agency, is looking at the effects of all the drugs known as selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, including Seroxat.
A spokesman for GSK said: "GlaxoSmithKline works with the regulatory authorities on an ongoing basis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of all our medicines, based on the most recent data, and this review is part of that continuous dialogue."
CITA can be contacted on 0151-932 0102 between 10am and 4pm on weekdays, and between 10am and 1pm on weekends.
Alternatively, Ms Armstrong can be contacted on 0151-286 9898.
Archive Home

http://archive.thenorthernecho.co.uk/2003/1/4/108873.html

CCHR / Scientology pay for Fiddaman's anti GSK ranting - 23 July 2009

click to enlarge

There are plans to introduce routine testing for CYPD26 polymorphisms for psychiatric inpatients in the very near future. Published in 2007, Oxford Un

The Human Brain and Its Disorders - Google Books

Seroxat patients tiny proportion of prescription drug addicts

uksurvivors : Message: Seroxat patients tiny proportion of prescription drug addicts: "However, the Seroxat patients are a tiny proportion of the growing number of people addicted to prescription drugs.

It's thought that between three and seven million Britons are affected, with


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1046612/How-doctors-turning-millions-INTO-addicts.html#ixzz0MAxXkEVB

How doctors are turning millions of us INTO addicts"

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/uksurvivors/message/46334

Seroxat - 30 man years of NHS time wasted on GSK prosecution - all that time & nobody gave a dam about other SSRI's

Seroxat - 30 man years of NHS time wasted on GSK prosecution - all that time & nobody gave a dam about other SSRI's

Seroxat - MHRA spent up to 30 person years on GSK non prosecution - thus had no time to regulate other Psychiatric drugsThe MHRA has, to date, spent between 14 and 30 person years (maybe £1m of drug industry funding) in not deciding to prosecute GlaxoSmithKline, since its investigation began in October 2003. Last month the Agency told Panorama, "that the investigation has been given substantial additional resources and remains a high priority" - but their latest communication on the subject suggests anything but: that 'high priority' stuff seems to be a media sop, a trip off some tongue in the Agency's "Communication Division". Do read this mail, if only to savour the tone: the MHRA rounds off a spluttering (spitting?) blast of disinformation with, "I hope this is helpful". Whatever your party, you might well wonder if the end of credible government is nigh.
http://www.socialaudit.org.uk/6070226-GREGOR.htm

Monday, 20 July 2009


http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_f_SNmaIfrzM/SmQ2kLC7s2I/AAAAAAAAAo8/hLMbDPJFVkg/s1600-h/Jofre+podcast+paxilprogress+Fiddaman.jpg

Jofre Coventry University podcast links on Fiddaman site - 25 Jan 2008

http://coventryuniversity.podbean.com/2007/11/01/one-woman-a-multinational-and-a-victory-shelley-jofre-panorama/









2.30 in Jofre says - " read a little bit in news paper about patients complaints" year 2000 about " Seroxat difficult to withdraw from" .. Jofre found it intriguing Jofre had only just started working on Panorama at that stage3.30 in " Jofre calls SSRI's "SELECTIVE Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors"4.14 Jofre knew little of how the pharmcutical industry worked4 .30 in Ed says - lets look at antidepressant story4 45 Jofre says although problems with whole class of antidepressants we (bbc) decided to concentrate on SeroxatWhy we narrowed down on Seroxat1 because it was made by GSK2 all the drugs in class cause suicidal thinking on dose change3 Seroxat had a unique problem of withdrawal BECAUSE IT WAS LONGER ACTING ... we decided to focus research into this drug 6.00 in - 40 min Panorama film took Shelley Jofre 8 months to make6.10 in - It's not something you do lightly WE WERE TAKING ON the worlds second largest drug company7.30 We were talking to the lawyer the whole way through production9.30 in - Jofre says "we took a punt" on Dr David Healy

Sunday, 19 July 2009

yet another climbdown as Fiddaman forced to remove posts comparing Tuesday & Bryce to Bonnie & Clyde



This is Google's cache of http://fiddaman.blogspot.com/2009/07/boring-senseless-and-paranoia.html. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on 8 Jul 2009 10:32:09 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more

Is this another humiliating Fiddaman climbdown as posts reviwing Tuesday1st blog removed from main Fiddaman blogspot?



This is Google's cache of http://fiddaman.blogspot.com/2009/05/new-blog-from-anti-seroxat-litigation.html. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on 6 Jul 2009 10:25:49 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more

Friday, 17 July 2009

Despite having to pull the content of three blogs liar Bob Fiddaman continues to defame two innocent people


Why Bob?
-
-
Why can't you admit you were wrong?

Bob Fiddaman's biggest lie is the one he tells himself everyday "I fight againsts GSK because they fucked my life up"


Matt, I fight againsts GSK because they fucked my life up,

Why did Bob Fiddaman go cold turkey when we know from Truthman30 that Healy & CITA had seroxat withdrawal plan early 2003?


Why did he stop the liquid he was already taking ?
Why did he bring all this misery on himself?

Seroxat article from the Northern Echo in 2003. - Thanks to Truthman30 an eye to put one's finger on it.


Seroxat withdrawal plans developed by Dr Healy / Pam Armstrong CITA were available prior to 2003 - extract from - Northern Echo 4th Feb2003

extract from - Northern Echo 4th Feb2003
"Wonder Drug Made My life Hell"
-
CITA has developed a number of withdrawal programmes with Dr David Healy, director of the North Wales Department of Psychological Medicine at the University of Wales. These include reducing Seroxat intake very slowly and using it in liquid form, which is considered gentler to the system during withdrawal. In tablet form, once down to 20mg, it can take at least another three and a half months to come off. The charity has found that switching from Seroxat to Prozac, once down to a 20mg dosage, is one of the most successful withdrawal methods. According to Pam, a qualified nurse and counsellor, there are more problems coming off Seroxat than other anti-depressant drugs because it is short acting, working for just a few hours, compared with the longest acting anti-depressant, Prozac.

Seroxat - BBC Panorama helpline directs caller to Hugh James


Recently I was watching the latest on Panorama in the UK regarding GSK and Seroxat. This time around it was revolving around teenagers taking Seroxat. There was a helpline number at the end of the programme. I wrote it down and waited for a few days befroe I rang it. I knew the lines would be busy you see!I was then put in touch with the solicitors appointed by the High Courts in the UK to take GSK to court. Their names aare Hugh James Solicitors of Cardiff (Wales). When I spoke to the solicitors they had some bad news for me. Unfortuantely the Government in the UK has placed a "cut-off" point on this case. This means that any cases over 10 years old will NOT be looked at! My case/story is 6 months over this 10 year "cut-off" point.......rather miffed but still.


Thursday, 16 July 2009

Matt Holford predicts that Fid would crack "you'll drive yourself fucking nuts, trying to work out what it's about"


From: matthew.holford@..
Subject: RE: Dear all
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008

OK: I understand precisely what your position is, I think. Just take a step back, for a second, and see what I'm seeing, here... I take it your concern has nothing to do whatever with what "Bryce" has to say, but rather that he will be believed, in some quarters, even where the information underpinning any rumours is wholly fabricated, as with this swingers thing (incidentally "WetandWild2008" only wants email chat, but flashes her tits in an accompanying image - talk about conflicting messages!). It's been said that Bryce has no credibility, when he makes his "attacks" on you. I think that's probably true - I hardly feel the need to jump to your defence - I think only somebody who was already motivated to dislike you, for whatever reason, would feel inclined to look past the lack of substantiated evidence and believe that what was written amounted to anything. And it's fucking boring to read, too, because it's not at all clear where he's going. How can I put it, better? He doesn't tell one, up front, where he's going with his arguments, and so one is left floundering, trying to understand him. I mean one may only hear "Bob Fiddaman's a cunt," so many times, before one feels inclined to say "yeah, great: you've said that, already. So, what?" There's nothing there, Bob - it's utterly vacuous. That's it: 10 sentences, and I've lost interest in the guy. And in truth, nobody will find anything interesting in a message that is just repeated, endlessly, without progressing - it's the very fact of movement that makes any argument interesting, even if one does not agree, and that element is missing, with Bryce. Now one thing I abso-fucking-lutely forbid you to do is to start speculating about his motives. There is no fucking end to that game, Bob, and you'll drive yourself fucking nuts, trying to work out what it's about (which is what I meant by getting dragged into his reality): he won't tell you (we know this, because Stephany and I, for two, have asked him, directly), and he may or may not know that that is the only thing that is keeping you interested in his utterances. I'll give you a hypothesis, which will hold true, and then you can lose interest: he's getting a reaction, and it makes him feel good, or in control, or he feels release, or something by doing it. That's all. I doubt that there is deeper motive, here - and even if there is, he'll never disclose that, to you, because then he'd lose his hold. One final thing: he can't discredit you. He can only have you fear being discredited. Check your log, Bob: Bryce has been sniping at you for some time, but the Worshipful Company is still keeping close tabs on you. They're still worried about what you're saying, and nothing Bryce can dream up will allay those fears. Matt

Fid knew "Bryce was once very anti GSK and Seroxat something happened" - yeah must have found out Harvey was a crook exploiting MH patients?


One thing I do know is that Jeremy Bryce was once very anti GSK and Seroxat. Something happened that made him change his mind and turn his attentions on Seroxat campaigners.

Fiddaman - you should have listened to Matt Holford !

(note Bob's words are in bold italic)
I'll reply on Matt's points
----- Original Message -----


Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 Subject:

RE: Dear all




A word of counsel to you, Bob, which you may take, or leave. From where I'm sat, it looks like you feel obliged to respond to Bryce, if Bryce it is, who has created this blog. You have no such obligation, for a start.

Matt, it is very hard not to fight my corner when allegations are made about me. Yes, I know, it's easy to ignore from where most of you are sitting but you want to try sitting where I am and having some cretin post about how I'm a benefit cheat, a racist, a parasite and now, it seems, someone who signs up to swinging sites!


Second, Bryce acts in complete secrecy: his objective, if he has one, is a secret, which he will not disclose, even when questioned directly. He will not permit outsiders to intrude on his train of thought, as evidenced by his refusal to discuss his objective, and his decision to not allow outsiders to post on this blog. Everything is being done covertly, and you've followed suit, here. Now, Bryce may be self taught, or it may be completely by chance that he's conducting himself, in this way: he's drawn you in, so that you always, but always, respond, and he's leading you further and further into his reality. Secrecy is not a good place to be, Bob. GSK is the epitomy of secrecy, and you wouldn't choose to imitate it. If you still feel the need to respond, do so completely openly: state on your blog that you intend to complain, and explain why. And then DON'T go looking for what his response to that is. Also, I recommend that you don't ask people to involve themselves in this: it won't look natural, and assuming that Blogspot discloses that there have been multiple complaints, it will occur to Bryce that you have orchestrated it, even though he won't be able to prove it. He will then escalate the dispute, in some way, which you will then respond to, and so on, and so on. It's an incredibly destructive game, Fidders; give it up - make your statement, take whatever action you feel inclined to take (I suggest you do nothing other than state your position), and then walk away.

I walked away 24 hours ago and then I get the swingers site thing in my inbox, he has set me up so he can write about me!


I understand that this advice runs contrary to the route you feel moved to take, and as such you may dismiss it. I hope you don't, because you're expending a great deal of effort, when you're achieving nothing, with this.

Matt, I fight againsts GSK because they fucked my life up, it's only natural that I should fight against someone who seems hellbent on discrediting me.

I won't go into his forum again, I won't allow my kids to publicly ask him to stop what he's doing.

One thing I do know is that Jeremy Bryce was once very anti GSK and Seroxat. Something happened that made him change his mind and turn his attentions on Seroxat campaigners.

I understand where you are coming from Matt but this is beyond a joke. He even has a photo of me and my ex love from Australia in the files section of UK Survivors.


Matt

BBC Panorama took a "punt" on Healy - they put their eggs in one basket

9.30 in - Jofre says "we took a punt" on Dr David Healy

Shelley Jofre says "we were taking on" GSK - actually Shelly it was Mark Harvey who was taking them on - you were fixing it for him


6.00 in - 40 min Panorama film took Shelley Jofre 8 months to make

6.10 in - It's not something you do lightly WE WERE TAKING ON the worlds second largest drug company

7.30 We were talking to the lawyer the whole way through production

Shelley Jofre you didn't know what you were broadcasting about & you were led by the nose by Mark Harvey

2.30 in Jofre says - " read a little bit in news paper about patients complaints" year 2000 about " Seroxat difficult to withdraw from" .. Jofre found it intriguing
Jofre had only just started working on Panorama at that stage

3.30 in " Jofre calls SSRI's "SELECTIVE Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors"


4.14 Jofre knew little of how the pharmcutical industry worked

4 .30 in Ed says - lets look at antidepressant story

4 45 Jofre says although problems with whole class of antidepressants we (bbc) decided to concentrate on Seroxat


Why we narrowed down on Seroxat
1 because it was made by GSK
2 all the drugs in class cause suicidal thinking on dose change
3 Seroxat had a unique problem of withdrawal BECAUSE IT WAS LONGER ACTING ... we decided to focus research into this drug

BBC Shelley Jofre podcast blows Mark Harvey's case

Panorama reporter Shelley Jofre discusses her investigated allegations that psychiatric drugs, in particular the best-selling antidepressent Seroxat have devestating side effects and are being over-prescribed to children in the UK and US. Shelly questions how much faith we should put in the medicines we take.

Wednesday, 15 July 2009

Fiddaman is "Taking some time-out from the world of blogging"

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

TIME OUT
Taking some time-out from the world of blogging folks.Don't know how long I'll be out of the loop but I need a break from all this. Meantime, check out Seroxat Secrets & GSK : Licence to (K) Ill plus all the links in my blogroll down the right hand side of the page.I wish you all well and will write again in the near future.Until then...Fid

http://fiddaman.blogspot.com/2009/07/time-out.html

Matt Holford said "I don't think that blog is identified as being authored by Bryce"


From: matthew.holford@hotmail.co.uk
To: fiddaman64@blueyonder.co.uk;
Subject: RE: Dear all
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008

Oh, and one other thing: Bryce, if Bryce it is, doesn't often identify himself, so, truth be told, one doesn't really know who one is being attacked by, even though the modus operandi, language, etc, are familiar. For example, I don't think that blog is identified as being authored by Bryce, and although it's been assumed that "Sara xx," on those Furious Seasons threads, was Bryce, we don't know that for sure, either. This creates uncertainty, in one's mind, but only because one feels inclined to attack back, in the same way. Don't, it doesn't work, as a methodology. Instead, deal with what has been said, and convey one's message as succinctly as possibly, preferably conveying your complete and utter boredom with the subject matter. Bryce, if Bryce it is, says the same thing, again and again and again. You only have to rebut, once, and then I suggest that you refine your rebuttal - that is, do what he does, which is repeat yourself, over and over and over again. He will either give up, or you will get some movement. If he won't state his objective, such that you can decide whether you wish to argue towards it, then I don't see what else you can do. Matt

Google has not removed all or indeed any part of this blog therefore do not deem it unsavory & Bob; thanks for all the visitors




Subject: Dear all

Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008



Bob said




"As with all blogs, there is a button at the top which says 'FLAG BLOG' If this is pressed by many visitors, Blogger will take a look into the content and if deemed unsavory will remove the blog"

Bob says " I'm all for free speech but " Bob decides what people are free to talk about


Bob Fiddaman said to rather a lot of people -
Subject: Dear all
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008

"As you may or may not be aware, I have been the target of scathing written attacks on the internet of late.

These stem from Jeremy Bryce, a 55 year old from Downpatrick, Northern Ireland.

He has created a blog about me where he continues to write about my disability, finances and in general inciting hatred toward me.

As with all blogs, there is a button at the top which says 'FLAG BLOG'

If this is pressed by many visitors, Blogger will take a look into the content and if deemed unsavory will remove the blog.

I'm all for free speech but this man, Jeremy Bryce, has overstepped the mark. He has even published my name and address online and continues to goad me with cartoons with my image pasted on.

Please help by clicking the 'FLAG BLOG' button"

Tuesday, 14 July 2009

Seroxat BBC Panorama - "We were talking to the lawyer the whole way through prouction" - WHY?


6.15 Jofre says - we were taking on second largest drug company in the world


7.30 We were talking to the lawyer the whole way through prouction

Shelley Jofre of BBC Panorama knew that all the SSRI's in the class were causing problems but the BBC chose to TARGET GSK's Seroxat - WHY?


4.14 Jofre knew little of how the pharmcutical industry worked
4 .30 in Ed says - lets look at antidepressant story
4 45 Jofre says although problems with whole class of antidepressants we (bbc) decided to concentrate on Seroxat - Targeting GSK because they are UK based
5.00 in - all the drugs cause suicidal thinking

5.30 in - Jofre says Seroxat had a unique problem of withdrawal BECAUSE IT WAS LONGER ACTING ... we decided to focus research into this drug
6.15 Jofre says - we were taking on second largest drug company in the world
7.30 We were talking to the lawyer the whole way through prouction

Coventry University Podcasts » Blog Archive » One woman, a multinational and a victory - Shelley Jofre, Panorama

Coventry University Podcasts » Blog Archive » One woman, a multinational and a victory - Shelley Jofre, Panorama

Panorama reporter Shelley Jofre discusses her investigated allegations that psychiatric drugs, in particular the best-selling antidepressent Seroxat have devestating side effects and are being over-prescribed to children in the UK and US. Shelly questions how much faith we should put in the medicines we take


http://www1.coventry.ac.uk/podcasts

Ernest Venn


I am Sarah Venn's father and I cried when watching the programme. I felt for the families of those who have lost loved ones. I have nursed and watched my daughter attempt to withdraw from Seroxat only to be there when she failed after 12 months of effort that you or I would have given up after one week. GSKB have only one interest - to make money.

Sarah Venn's father posts on BBC Panorama site - but no mention that he co-wrote/modified Healy's original withdrawal protocol


I have just watched the third series of Panorama addressing the very serious problems of patients taking Seroxat. I commend the production team for an excellent and balanced view that has hitherto been kept secret by GSKB.
I am Sarah Venn's father and I cried when watching the programme. I felt for the families of those who have lost loved ones. I have nursed and watched my daughter attempt to withdraw from Seroxat only to be there when she failed after 12 months of effort that you or I would have given up after one week. GSKB have only one interest - to make money.
Dr Benbow is a highly paid executive of GSK who only cares about his wealth, not the interests of the public who are prescribed the drugs the company he works for make. I was appalled to listen to Prof Sir Alasdair justify his position in not controlling the drugs agency. For me he should be sacked, not allowed to resign, and his knighthood taken away. I am a saddened father but thankful to your programme for bringing this very important topic to the attention of the people. Ernest Venn, England



http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/3708214.stm

Monday, 13 July 2009

Bob Fiddaman considers himself worse off than the mother & her two hour old dead baby





Cyndi only a vile and nasty person would use such posts to paint themselves as 'victim' ........

from Bob's fiddaman.blogspot.com



because she was taking Effexor not Seroxat - this was Bob Fiddamans response!

He considers himself worse off than the mother - more important than a two hour old dead baby.

This is the sort of person you choose to believe - the sort of person you're supporting!!

Tues http://groups.yahoo.com/group/uksurvivors/message/45883

Dr Hart said "We have all done things on these medications we are not proud of" - check out Phillip Carmichael who took dostinex


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/paedophilia-blamed-on-teachers-medication-927095.html Paedophilia blamed on teacher's medication By Chris Green Friday, 12 September 2008 A former headmaster who amassed thousands of indecent images of children on his computer walked free from court yesterday, after a judge ruled that the drug he had been taking to treat his Parkinson's disease was responsible for his crime. Phillip Carmichael, 58, pleaded guilty to the offences, but received an absolute discharge escaping any form of punishment after claiming that the pills he had been taking turned him into a paedophile. Police discovered 8,000 images and videos stored on the former schoolteacher's computer during a raid on his home in Wantage, Oxfordshire. But only one of them had been downloaded before he was prescribed dopamine-stimulating drugs to treat his two illnesses, Parkinson's disease and Graves' disease. Mr Carmichael, the former headmaster of a primary school, who had an "impeccable record", claimed the medicine was known to have side effects including compulsive gambling, shopping and hypersexuality, or sex addiction. The defendant took both cabergoline and ropinirole, collectively known as dopamine agonists. Cabergoline has since been withdrawn from use.

Fidders, mate, let it go... I warned you about getting drawn in


Radagast said

Fidders, mate, let it go... I warned you about getting drawn into their reality.I know it's difficult not to respond, when you see an accusation levelled against you, but just roll with it, man. Stick up a link to Mardi's blog, give her a bit of publicity, and leave it at that.You're spending valuable time and effort on something that doesn't really impact you, at all. Take a step back, get a new perspective, see the ridiculousness of it, laugh, and then get on with something more productive.Matt
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10459981&postID=628606919444050694

Sunday, 12 July 2009

Real purpose of Fiddaman / MHRA meeting, at request of MHRA, was to discuss their window dressing Patient and Public Engagement Strategy


Simon Gregor said -
"However, I am happy to share with you (on the basis of my own recollections) the key themes of the meeting. I requested the meeting with Mr Fiddaman to seek his views on our recently published Patient and Public Engagement Strategy. This document is freely available on our website" -http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/comms-sp/documents/publication/con041519.pdf.

Will Bob Fiddaman write about all the liquid SSRI's or just continue his fishing trip for Mark Harvey? Don't hold your breath!

Lustral/Sertraline liquid

Will Bob Fiddaman write to the MHRA about the equally vague choice of words in Escitalopram liquid PIL?



Please note
Some patients with manic-depressive illness may enter into a manic phase. This is characterized by unusual and rapidly changing ideas, inappropriate happiness and excessive physical activity. If you experience this, contact your doctor.
Symptoms such as restlessness or difficulty in sitting or standing still can also occur during the first weeks of the treatment. Tell your doctor immediately if you experience these symptoms.

Seroxat Patient Information Leaflet - Vague. OOPS looks like the Prozac one is equally vague !!



Like all medicines, Prozac can cause side effects, although not everybody gets them.
• If you get a rash or allergic reaction such as itching, swollen lips/tongue or
wheezing/shortness of breath, stop taking the medicine straight away and tell your
doctor immediately.
If you feel restless and cannot sit or stand still, you may have akathisia; increasing your
dose of Prozac may make you feel worse.
If you feel like this, contact your doctor.
• Tell your doctor immediately if your skin starts to turn red or you develop a varied skin
reaction or your skin starts to blister or peel. This is very rare.

Saturday, 11 July 2009

MHRA says Efexor is an SSRI, Biol Psychiatry says Seroxat is an SNRI whilst Archives of Pharmacology says SDRI

Meanwhile chief manipulator Mark Harvey has to proove -
-
-
"Does Seroxat have a capacity to cause asverse effects consequent upon or following discontinuance (withdrawl) such as prevent or make more difficult the ability of users to discontinue, withdraw from or remain free from taking Seroxat to a greater extent than all other Selective Serotonin Re-uptake Inhibitors (SSRIs)"