blogs created to prevent or detect a crime http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1997/ukpga_19970040_en_1

This blog is brougt to you consistent with subsection 3 of the Protection from Harassment Act - i.e. blogs created to prevent or detect a crime http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1997/ukpga_19970040_en_1



Sunday 30 November 2008

Your foe's foe is not necessarily your friend and I hope you are willing to consider that maybe you are making a mistake in promoting their material.

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10459981&postID=4173652055811560965


I share an unease with big pharma with you guys, but Scientology is just so shudderingly scary. Their fundamentalist fight against 'phychs' is one proponent of their cultic behavior.

If you google for 'IAS event 2007' you'll find videos about a big Scientology event where they show videos with texts such as 'obliterate psychiatry' on a background of images of exploding handgranates.

Why the zealousness? It is explained in the document you will find when you Google 'False purpose rundown wikileaks'. This leaked document is a high level course. In it, Hubbard talks about this great discovery he has made: 20% of the entire population is psychotic (including journalists and government people). The reason is that they have 'overts' - undiscovered crimes - which are directly or indirectly the fault of psychiatrists.

So psychiatrists are at fault of everything bad in this world according to Scientology? Even, say, 9/11? Of course not...that would paranoid wouldn't it?

Well....a few weeks ago the worldwide head of the branch of Scientology fighting 'psychs' (the CCHR) was on Swedish television explaining that 'psychs' ARE responsible for 9/11. After all, the right hand man of bin Laden, used to study psychiatry. QED isn't it?

The two points I'm trying to make:
1) I wish they would abolish the patent system for drugs and medicine. A very rewarding lump sum award for developing a cure for diseases would be a far better incentive system. It would be on developing cures, rather than on selling them.
2) Scientology is far, far more scarier than you could possibly imagaine.

Please keep number 2) in mind when you are arguing against the current drug system. I am just a random critic of Scientology (not the jeremy guy you linked to) but I really hope you are willing to reconsider whether you wish to use the CCHR material. Your foe's foe is not necessarily your friend and I hope you are willing to consider that maybe you are making a mistake in promoting their material.
Thank you for your attention,
Anonymous

1:36 PM

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.