blogs created to prevent or detect a crime http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1997/ukpga_19970040_en_1

This blog is brougt to you consistent with subsection 3 of the Protection from Harassment Act - i.e. blogs created to prevent or detect a crime http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1997/ukpga_19970040_en_1



Monday, 15 August 2011

SEROXAT litigant suffered no lasting effects - barrister Sarah Venn now defends BIG BUSINESS





Sarah frequently acts in a range of employer’s liability claims, including ‘six-pack’ and disease claims. She has an excellent understanding of asbestos-related diseases, manual handling injuries and noise-induced hearing loss claims and frequently appears in ‘show-cause’ hearings under the expedited procedure for living mesothelioma claims.







•Defending a range of claims brought against supermarkets by employees who have been injured at work

•Advising on the operation of the Limitation Act 1980 in a claim prosecuted by an individual who alleged he had developed noise-induced hearing loss as a consequence of working in heavy industry

•Defending a claim brought by a manager who contended she suffered psychiatric harm as a result of stress at work

•Advising a street-maintenance company on a claim brought by an employee who contended that he had developed a repetitive strain injury

•Advising an airport baggage handling company on a number of claims arising from alleged contraventions of the Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992

•Assisting with the successful defence of a claim brought by an employee who contended that his employer was liable for a defective tool he had fashioned himself and used at work
Do more, feel better, live longer

Sunday, 14 August 2011

Hardwickie - SARAH VENN at the top of her game thanks to GSK Seroxat & now defending big business














Product Liability


Sarah has an established product liability claims practice and has recently enjoyed a number of successes at trial.

Recent work

•Advising a sports shop that sold a gym-ball that exploded when used in accordance with instructions

•Successfully defending a claim brought against a supermarket that sold a microwave meal in packaging which was alleged to have deteriorated, causing the contents to leak and scald a consumer when cooked in accordance with the product’s instructions

•Successfully defending a claim prosecuted by a motorist who contended that the engine in his car had been irreparably damaged by petrol purchased from a supermarket

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Do more, feel better, live longer


Saturday, 13 August 2011

Scientology's Narconon Rehab Clinics: Are They a Racket Trying to Make New Converts?

Scientology's Narconon Rehab Clinics: Are They a Racket Trying to Make New Converts?


Narconon promises desperate addicts that they can sweat out their demons (and gobs of poisonous green ooze) by spending
 

SEROXAT has no lasting effect as barrister SARAH VENN proves as expert on FALSE CLAIMS


THEN -






SARA on SEROXAT treatment for her mental illness





NOW -










•Acting on behalf of members of the British Cycling Federation and British Triathlon Federation, injured when knocked from their bicycles on training runs

•Representing a number of insurance companies defending claims subject to criminal investigation

•Advising on the recovery of a judgment sum obtained against a Claimant who pursued a fraudulent claim


•Representing infants injured in potentially contrived accidents.

•Successfully defending a claim against a public service vehicle operator whose bus collided with a vehicle attempting to overtake it as it ‘swung out’ to negotiate a bend

•Acting on behalf of a police force whose vehicles were involved in collisions whilst responding to emergency calls

•Advising a passenger who fell from a mobility vehicle when access steps were not put in place

•Significantly reducing the value of a credit hire claim where the Claimant failed to mitigate their losses


SARAH VENN off SEROXAT - clearly cured of her MENTAL ILLNESS

read more about Sarah Venn here - http://www.hardwicke.co.uk/barrister-profile/_/14/sarah-venn - see how her career has soared

SEROXAT easy to get off as chart proves - so why doesn't FIDDAMAN get on with his life?

Chart 5 demonstrates the immense value to Society of free and independent Public Service Broadcasting and Internet communication. This combination has triggered the growth of awareness of SSRI danger. It has united the many thousands of victims of SSRIs across the world with some professionals who have laboured so long in a cause for saving lives, seeking justice and exposing dysfunctional drug regulation. Chart 5 shows that the tide has turned in the UK. Great encouragement should be taken from this life saving victory. However efforts must continue both to expose the known risks of paroxetine (Seroxat, Paxil) and all the other ill validated SSRIs and to call for the establishment an effective independent Drug Safety Regulator in every country, the absence of which is the root cause of this ongoing officially supported tragedy.”



Friday, 12 August 2011

CCHR Jan Eastgate - R v JANICE MEYER 201100178789 - AUG 18th 2011

Listing Type: Mention (Police)    

Jurisdiction: Criminal

Court: Local

Presiding officer:Unassigned

Location: Downing Centre

courtroom: Online Court

case title/party: R v JANICE MEYER

case number: 201100178789





http://searchcourtlists.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/scm/search



18 Aug 09:30 Mention (Police) Criminal Local Unassigned Downing Centre Online Court R v JANICE MEYER 201100178789



http://www.criminal-lawyers.com.au/w...ention_hearing





http://www.ipc.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/Corporate/ll_corporate.nsf/vwFiles/150211_online_court.pdf/$file/150211_online_court.pdf





NI death sentence man was subjected to water torture - Army forced to reveal @ FIDDAMAN counterpoint blog

Last NI death sentence man Holden bids to clear name




Liam Holden's case is being heard in the Court of Appeal in Belfast The last man sentenced to death in Northern Ireland is to gain further access to a secret dossier, the Appeal Court in Belfast has ruled.



The move is part of a legal bid by Liam Holden, from Ballymurphy, west Belfast, to overturn his conviction for murder.



The Lord Chief Justice said the first 28 paragraphs of a confidential annex should be disclosed to Mr Holden.



Holden claims water torture was used to extract a confession for the murder of a British soldier 40 years ago.



He was to be executed after being found guilty of shooting Private Frank Bell in September 1971.



Although the death penalty was abolished in Britain in 1969, it remained in Northern Ireland until 1973.



Holden's death sentence, however, was commuted to life imprisonment and he served 17 years in jail before applying to an independent body set up to examine alleged miscarriages of justice.



New evidence



The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) referred his conviction back to the Court of Appeal on the basis that it may have been unsafe.



The move followed an examination of new evidence and the admissibility and reliability of confessions in the case.



Last year the Ministry of Defence agreed to disclose three secret documents to Holden after reviewing their classification.






His lawyers urged senior judges to grant access to the rest of the dossier held on him.




In his judgment Lord Chief Justice Sir Declan Morgan, sitting with Lord Justice Coghlin, set out how Holden was seeking disclosure of 15 items of sensitive material made available to the CCRC on a confidential basis.



Some of that information forms the basis for conclusions reached by the commission that the murder conviction may be unsafe.



'Sensitive material'



Sir Declan said: "We have carefully considered the entirety of the confidential information.



"In respect of the issues surrounding the admissibility of the appellant's alleged confessions, we are satisfied that the documents which have now been disclosed comprise all of the relevant material within the sensitive material made available to the CCRC.



"We also consider that the first 28 paragraphs of the confidential annex made available to us by the CCRC, which sets out the reasons for the conclusions reached... should now be made available to the appellant.



"We do not consider that any further disclosure is required."



Acknowledging the continuing obligation for disclosure throughout any criminal trial and appeal , Sir Declan added that the determination may have to be reviewed if any further issues emerge.



Following the ruling, Mr Holden's lawyer, Patricia Coyle, said: "While this partial access is not ideal we will consider this material when received and prepare the next stage of the case."

Thursday, 11 August 2011

British Army killed innocent man - 1971 state execution revealed on FIDDAMAN counterpoint blog

HET report says Army killed innocent man






Mr McKavanagh was shot dead by the Army in 1971 A Catholic shot dead by the Army in August 1971 in Northern Ireland was innocent, a report by the Historic Enquiries Team has said.

Billy McKavanagh, 21, was shot in the back as he ran away when confronted by soldiers in the Markets area near Belfast city centre, the report said.

The soldier responsible maintains that the person he shot was armed.

The HET, however, said he was not carrying the weapon, a rivet gun which had been looted and left in the street.

The report said it had been picked up by members of Mr McKavanagh's group.

"Billy's death was an absolute tragedy that should not have happened," the HET said.

"He was an innocent man who did nothing more than pick up a pair of waders that had been stolen by someone else and then run away when confronted by the Army."

The HET is a team of detectives investigating conflict murders.

The victim's family has called for an army apology.

Lost Lives, a book which chronicles every death during the Northern Ireland Troubles, said Mr McKavanagh's body was found in McAuley Street, not far from his home at Henrietta Street.

It added that the army claimed he was a gunman but the IRA said neither he, not his brother or cousin who were arrested after the shooting, were members of the republican movement.

It said the Northern Star, a publication by the People's Democracy movement, was critical of British press reports which said the Royal Green Jackets had laid siege to a bakery for several hours and killed a sniper after advancing under a hailcounterpoint blog of bullets.

Lost Lives continued: "The Northern Star report went on to say that due to 'excellent detective work' by Michael Heney of the Irish Times, it was established that the dead man was shot some 150 yards from Inglis's Bakery 'after panicking after having received into his possession a pair of looted fishing waders, when he was ordered to stop'".

"An army press officer, asked to comment on the evidence, was reported to have said: 'There was a lot of confusion about that night. In fact, there was no sniper shot in Inglis's factory - that is correct'".

Anonymous: Operation Facebook, Nov 5 2011 - KILL FACEBOOK video - FIDDAMAN counterpoint blog

Wednesday, 10 August 2011

Bob Fiddaman, Seroxat and Scientology

Scientology library: “Janice "Jan" Eastgate Meyer” - CCHR - FIDDAMAN leader

SEROQUEL Law Firms have sold their clients down the river - just like FIDDAMAN Seroxat lawyers


Weitz & Luxenberg p.c. Settlement Letter to Seroquel Victims - TIME TO REJECT this Insult on Top of Injury






I would like to thank a brave, courageous, and ethical anonymous source who has send in this letter correspondence they received from the law firm of Weitz & Luxenberg. This letter doesn't require a whole lot of commentary.





It's obvious that Law Firms have sold their clients down the proverbial river while at the same time enriching themselves (who's best interest are you obligated too fulfill?). This settlement offer and the injured litigants legal representation has carried out a blatant miscarriage of justice, a forever horrible stain upon the American Justice system, and a orchestrated crime perpetrated upon victims of this well documented & evidenced unbridled & unregulated corporate criminal enterprise gone a rye.





The time has now come for the victims to stand up to this criminal corporation "AstraZeneca" & their poison drug "Seroquel", to reject this horrible injustice and settlement offer. We want, what America & our Constitution promises us all, our day in court before a jury of our peers....

____________________________________________________________



Weitz & Luxenberg P.C.





We are happy to report excellent news! After a long and hard fought legal battle, AstraZeneca has agreed to participate in a Settlement Program to resolve Weitz & Luxenberg ("W &L") Seroguel cases. Our patience and aggressive litigating has resulted in very favorable settlement terms for our clients which will be further outlined below. We have carefully reviewed all of the factors of this agreement and we believe that this settlement offers you the best, and very likely the only opportunity to receive a fair resolution of your lawsuit. Therefore, we strongly recommend that you sign and complete the enclosed "Release Form", "Track Selection Form" and "Brief Questionnaire" and AGREE to participate.





As you know, we have engaged in a long legal battle with AstraZeneca over the past 6 years.

Weitz & Luxenberg led the charge for the Plaintiffs around the Country. AstraZeneca put up a tremendous and expensive defense and they successfully were able to get a large number of cases to be permanently dismissed by the court. Weitz & Luxenberg is the only firm who took a case to trial anywhere in the Country. However, after a month-long trial, the jury unfortunately ruled in favor of the defendants. This loss did not affect the strength of our fight. Over the past year, even as almost every other plaintiffs firm settled their cases, Weitz & Luxenberg prepared two more cases for trial which was scheduled to begin this Summer. As a direct result of the endless and consistent pressure applied by the attorneys at Weitz & Luxenberg, we are happy to report that AstraZeneca has now agreed to participate in a favorable settlement program. Based on public reports regarding settlement programs reached with other plaintiff law firms we are confident that the settlement program outlined below has more favorable terms and for this reason we are recommending your participation.





The defendants have argued that they refuse to pay anyone who cannot prove through medical records or via certification that they have used Seroquel. They also refuse to pay anyone whose case is not active in this litigation. We recently told you about the Order issued by the Court requiring you to confirm when you started taking Seroquel and when you stopped taking Seroquel. We cannot stress enough that you MUST read, complete and return this certification form to us immediately. The failure to return this form within the next 30 days will result in the permanent dismissal of your case. In order to protect your legal rights, to keep your case active and be permitted to participate in this Settlement Program you must take this Order very seriously and you must respond.





Based on our experience in other litigations and having reviewed the media reports of the terms of other firms' Seroquel settlement programs, we know that the defendants are looking for a settlement program that includes all claimants (W &L Seroquel Plaintiffs) so that they will achieve complete closure of the entirYlitigation. Our goal in this negotiation was to obtain a settlement for the most amount of money using a fair method to pay our clients based upon the merits of their individual case. We also stressed our intentions that the case review and payment process be performed quickly yet fairly so that our clients can receive their settlements as soon as possible. A key part of this settlement program is that a claimant cannot be part of the settlement if their case is dismissed and unless they provide, at the very least, a certification that they in fact took Seroquel and suffered an injury. Therefore, please make sure that you return your certification form to us immediately



We have hired Hon.Marina Corodemus to act as the Special Master for the W&L Seroquel settlement program. Judge Corodemus previously ran the New Jersey Mass Tort Court and has a lot of experience in this field. She was appointed as a Special Master by the Vioxx State and Federal Court Judges to determine the appropriateness of Vioxx settlements and to resolve Vioxx appeals. She has also served as the Special Master in many other litigations such as Bextra and Celebrex which used similar settlement terms. We have met several times with Judge Corodemus and discussed the goals outlined above to get the most amount of money to the most amount of claimants in the fastest amount of time possible. We believe that Judge Corodemus is the perfect choice to create and oversee a settlement program in accordance with these goals.

The W&L Seroquel Settlement Program involves Weitz & Luxenberg's 2,351 clients. Only those clients with active cases (not dismissed as outlined above) can participate in this settlement program. Unlike other settlement programs that you may have read about in the media and internet, the W &L Settlement program does not award every case an equal settlement amount. The size of an individual's settlement will depend entirely on the merit of that individual's case. As a direct result of the large number of cases represented by W &L, and the merits of those cases, we are confident that we have obtained the best possible settlement for our clients. After complex negotiations, AstraZeneca





has agreed to deposit $92.25 Million dollars into a trust account to be used for this Settlement Program. This amount is completely confidential and you should NOT discuss this with anyone. A settlement of this type is called an "Aggregate Settlement" where a fair and reasonable sum of money is obtained to resolve multiple cases. In order to maintain proper representation of each individual client, W &L is NOT involved in the allocation decision making, which will be handled exclusively by Judge Corodemus. W &L has reviewed the general framework of the settlement plan with Judge Corodemus and we strongly believe that it is fair and reasonable and offers each of our clients the best possible outcome under the circumstances of this litigation.

Track I offers the Seroquel claimant a settlement of $12,000. This track involves a simple review of each case and will result in a quick approval by Judge Corodemus without an analysis of the specific details of the case such as injury, amount of Seroquel taken, how close the last Seroquel use was to the date of the injury or the individual claimant's risk factors.

a) Cannot prove that they suffered diabetes or a diabetes related condition, and/or

b) Cannot prove that they used Seroquel within 1 year of their claimed injury, and/or

c) Had a large number of known risk factors for diabetes before they started taking Seroquel.

For example - obesity, family history, smoking, etc.



Therefore, all cases whose injuries are limited to weight gain or high blood sugar and whose medical records will confirm that they were never diagnosed with diabetes or pancreatitis, should choose Track 1. Similarly, any claimed injury that occurred long after the last use of Seroquel should also choose Track 1. These cases are likely to receive a small award in Track II (likely less than $12,000) because it is extremely difficult to prove that these injuries were caused by Seroquel. Therefore, we suggest that if your case falls into this category you should choose Track 1. Additionally, payment of Track I settlement awards will be processed first once AstaZeneca waives its "walk away right". (See Section IV(C) below)

Track II involves an in-depth review of the severity of the injury, the claimed use of Seroquel and its proximity to the injury as well the available proof found in the contemporaneous medical records. Additionally, Judge Corodemus will strongly consider many known risk factors for these injuries including but not limited to smoking, obesity and family history as well as the participation in the Zyprexa settlement for these same injuries. This model is very similar to the one used in the National Vioxx Settlement Program as well as dozens of other similar settlement programs which were successfully resolved in recent years. Judge Corodemus has established a points system and will consider all of the critical issues including but not limited to:





- Nature of the injury

- Severity of the injury

- Age at the time of injury

- Proximity of Seroquel use to the claimed injury

- Changes in the Seroque11abel

- Risk Factors including Smoking, Body Mass Index, etc.

After carefully reviewing all of the medical records and the individual fact sheet, Judge Corodemus will assign a point value to each case. The more points a case is awarded based on the specific facts of the case, the larger the settlement will be. At this time, there is no way to predict with accuracy how many points an individual case may be awarded and it is even more difficult to determine how much money each point will receive. The exact value of each point will depend on the number of participants in Track II and the total number of points assigned. All cases in Track II will be eligible for a settlement award but Judge Corodemus could award LESS than $12,000 (what people will receive automatically by choosing Track 1) if the case lacks merit. In the interest of fairness, Judge Corodemus has committed to review each case in Track II very carefully and this process will take time to complete. Judge Corodemus has stated that she hopes to have this process completed by the end of 2011 but please be warned that it could take a little longer due to the amount of work that is involved. However, in order to get this settlement process moving forward and ultimately paid you must send us your signed Release form as soon as possible.

If you choose Track I your settlement award of $12,000 is set. If you choose Track II, Judge Corodemus will review your claim and will issue an award. We expect that we will contact you in approximately November 2011 and notify you of your point award and the expected amount of your settlement. At that point, you will be given a choice to accept your award, appeal your award or withdraw from the settlement program. If you accept, we will forward your release to AstraZeneca for their review and approval. Please understand that this settlement is not official until we send AstraZeneca your signed Release Form, AstraZeneca approves it AND AstraZeneca waives its walk away right. In the interest of time, we are asking you to return your signed Release Form now so we can meet the tight deadlines associated with this settlement. If you are unhappy with your allocation amount and/or believe that your case involves "Extraordinary Injury or Circumstances" you have the right to appeal your award. Upon receipt of such an application, Judge Corodemus will re-review your records and make a final decision. Please be aware that there is no additional right of appeal (to Judge Corodemus or to any Court) once this final decision is made. If you decide to decline the settlement amount offered to you, you must notify us within ten days of your receipt of your allocation amount and your signed Release Form will no longer be valid.

As in all settlements of this type, our agreement with the defendant depends on nearly full participation from all of our clients. Under the terms of our agreement, we must provide Qualifying Materials (Release Form and/or Dismissal) for 2,260 of our clients. Once we reach this number, AstraZeneca's "walk away right" is officially waived. We strongly believe that our clients will agree that this settlement program offers the best possible terms and we expect that we will meet this requirement in the next 90-120 days. In order to meet this deadline we MUST have your complete





cooperation and immediate response. Of course, if we do not meet this required number of responses, Astrazeneca can decide to withdraw its settlement offer to everyone whether one signed the Release Form or not. Therefore, time is of the essence.

A. Release Form: Enclosed you will find a Release Form which you must sign in front of a notary in Order to participate in the settlement. If you have a spouse he/she must sign the Release Form as well. Attached to the Release Form will be an instruction sheet to guide you to ensure that this important form is signed the right way. A Release Form that is signed the wrong way or that is not witnessed (by a notary) is useless and will not be accepted by the defendants. The Release Form is your agreement to participate in the settlement program and at the same time discontinue your lawsuit in exchange for your settlement award. Please turn to Page 2 of the Release Form and complete the details of your Seroquel use. You may refer to Page 1 of the Brief Questionnaire which lists the Seroquel information that was found in your medical records or that you have previously provided to us. If this information is inaccurate, please cross it out and write in when you started and when you stopped taking Seroquel on BOTH the Release Form and the Brief Questionnaire. Due to the fast approaching deadlines, and our goal to get you your settlement processed and paid as quickly as possible, we MUST receive this signed release form back from you before August 31, 2011. Please use the envelope provided herein and return the signed and notarized release form today before you forget about it. Please note that once we submit your release form to AstraZeneca it can not be revoked.

B. Track Selection Form: Enclosed you will find a "Track Selection Form" which is the form used to officially notify the Special Master which Track you want your case to follow. Please Note that there are 4 options on this form. You MUST check one of the Options. If you want to participate in this settlement, and we strongly think that you should, you must check either Track I OR Track II and you must sign the bottom of the form. Your Track selection cannot be changed and is considered final once the Judge's Allocations are made. In other words, a person who chooses Track II and is awarded less than $12,000 CANNOT then choose to go to Track 1 for a higher award.

C. Brief Questionnaire: Enclosed you will find a 3 page Brief Questionnaire which has

important information about your claim. For all claimants who choose to enter Track II, Judge Corodemus will be reviewing your medical records, your Fact Sheet and this Brief Questionnaire and will issue a point award. Judge Corodemus will consider the proof of your claim found in your medical records as well as the information that you provide in this Questionnaire. Therefore, it is important that you answer these questions honestly and completely and that they are consistent with what is found in your medical records.





litigation and our conversations with our medical experts, it is clear that Seroquel lawsuits are very difficult to win, very expensive, and very time consuming to take through to trial, verdict and appeal. Over the past six years only I case (from W&L) of24,000 cases in the Country made it to and through trial. Countless other cases were prepared and then dismissed based on merit and/or inability to prove that Seroquel caused the injury. Just because an individual took Seroquel and suffered an injury like diabetes does not mean that such a case will win at trial. In order to succeed at trial, a plaintiff must prove both that Seroquel can cause such an injury in general AND that, within a reasonable degree of medical certainty, Seroquel caused this injury to this particular person (despite any individual risk factors such as smoking, weight, high blood sugar, family history etc.). We have told you in the past update letters that the Courts have consistently ruled in favor of the defendants on many of these issues and have prohibited medical experts from testifying because of a lack of scientific proof linking the plaintiff s injuries to his/her Seroquel use. It is also important to note that even if your case is able to advance past this judicial scrutiny, a trial of this magnitude will cost over $750,000 per case and many of these costs are reimbursed off of the top of a favorable verdict reducing the amount received by the plaintiff. Furthermore, any case that is won at trial will surely face a lengthy and hard-fought appeal. Finally, nearly all of the Seroquel cases are being handled by three judges. Even at an accelerated pace, the chances are slim that your case would be tried in the next 10 years if not longer. In taking all of these factors into consideration, and considering the issues of risk and reward, we believe that a settlement of this type offers you the most advantageous resolution possible.

You will be notified once the Special Master issues your point award at which point you can appeal to the Special Master if you believe that your case involves extraordinary circumstances. Thereafter, the decision of the Special Master is final, binding and non-appealable.

We have retained the Garretson Law Firm to negotiate any and all Federal and State liens (Medicare/Medicaid/SSI) that may be applicable in your case. The Garretson Firm is a specialist in this field and they have obtained excellent results in their negotiation of similar liens in other litigations like Vioxx, Bextra, and Celebrex. Moreover, the Garretson Firm has already worked on thousands of other Seroquel cases and has been able to achieve excellent results in large part due to the volume of cases that they are able to include in a Global Resolution. At this time, the Garretson Firm has already negotiated with 44 individual states regarding Medicaid and they have reached an agreement to CAP Medicaid liens at a maximum of 20% of the settlement amount. Please see the enclosed blue booklet regarding governmental liens for more details. Additionally, please also be advised that if you or Weitz & Luxenberg are put on written notice of a private lien, for example from your medical provider, this lien must be resolved before any settlement proceeds can be distributed. If you have received any notice of a lien, please advise us immediately.

The terms of your signed contingency fee agreement will be in effect. We have taken great effort to keep the case specific expenses as low as possible. Under the terms of your agreement, the





contingency fee will be calculated after the expenses are deducted. Under the terms of our agreement with AstraZeneca, any interest earned on the settlement proceeds before allocation and payment to the individual clients will be used to offset the fixed costs of the Special Master and the Lien Administrator. Due to the low interest rates paid by all banks in this economy, we do not expect that there will be any leftover interest. However, in such a case, the leftover interest will be added to the settlement trust and will be distributed to all claimants as part of Judge Corodemus' allocation process.

After careful analysis of the likelihood of success in the court system, as well as the cost and time elements involved, we strongly recommend that you AGREE to participate in this settlement. We are confident that this settlement is the best possible resolution of your claim especially in light of the history of this litigation. We expect that any case that does not agree to participate in this settlement will have a very difficult time navigating through the Court system and trial dates may not be set for many years. Moreover, as we have seen, these cases will be aggressively defended by AstraZeneca and we expect that we will receive motions to dismiss and unfavorable decisions from the Court on unsettled cases in the coming months. Moreover, if this settlement program is not successful (we fail to reach the 98% response rate) we highly doubt that we will ever obtain a settlement amount and terms as good as those contained in this program.

While we hope that this letter and enclosures will help answer all of your questions, we understand that you may have additional questions for us. Please keep in mind that we are working very hard to evaluate each and every case individually and the many deadlines that are part of this settlement are fast approaching. Your case has been assigned to Judy Koenig. If you have an important question please call Judy Koenig at (800) 438-9786 and ask for extension 5860. If you reach a voice-mail, please leave a message and you will be called back as quickly as possible. Please do not leave multiple voicemail messages on the same day as that will slow down our ability to return your call. Additionally, if you have email access, please try to email your detailed questions to us at sqinfo@weitzlux.com and we will get back to you quickly. If this letter has successfully answered your questions, and you have decided to participate, please carefully follow the directions on the front page of the enclosed release form and send your signed and witnessed release formes), your Track Selection AND your Brief Questionnaire to us as soon as possible. If you still have questions after reviewing this letter and after speaking to us over the telephone and you would like to meet us in person, we will be happy to schedule a meeting in our office at your convenience. Finally, please remember that the detailed information regarding this settlement program is COMPLETELY CONFIDENTIAL and should not be shared or discussed with anyone.

Jonathan Sedgh, Esq Glenn Zuckerman, Esq.











Tuesday, 9 August 2011

Mark Duggan did not shoot at police, says IPCC - POLICE lies exposed @FIDDAMAN counterpoint blog

Mark Duggan did not shoot at police, says IPCC


Mark Duggan, whose shooting by police sparked London's riots, did not fire a shot at police officers before they killed him, the Independent Police Complaints Commission said on Tuesday.




Releasing the initial findings of ballistics tests, the police watchdog said a CO19 firearms officer fired two bullets, and that a bullet that lodged in a police radio was "consistent with being fired from a police gun".



One theory, not confirmed by the IPCC, is that the bullet became lodged in the radio from a ricochet or after passing through Duggan.



Duggan, 29, was killed last Thursday in Tottenham, north London, after armed officers stopped the minicab in which he was travelling.



The IPCC said Duggan was carrying a loaded gun, but it had no evidence that the weapon had been fired. It said tests were continuing.



The officer who fired the fatal shots has been removed from firearms duties, which is standard procedure, pending the IPCC investigation.



Officers from the Met's Operation Trident and Special Crime Directorate 11, accompanied by officers from CO19, the Met's specialist firearms command, stopped the silver Toyota Estima minicab in Ferry Lane, close to Tottenham Hale tube station, to arrest Duggan.



He was killed by a single gunshot wound to the chest, and received a second gunshot wound to his right bicep. He was pronounced dead at the scene at 6.41pm.



The IPCC's statement said the bullet lodged in the police radio was a "jacketed round". This is a police-issue bullet and is "consistent with having been fired from a [police] Heckler and Koch MP5", it said.



The non-police firearm found at the scene was a converted BBM Bruni self-loading pistol. The gun was found to have a "bulleted cartridge" in the magazine, which is being subjected to further forensic tests.



The officer whose radio was hit was taken to Homerton hospital where he was examined and discharged later that night. The minicab driver was not injured but was badly shaken by what he saw, the IPCC said. His account, as well as those of the officers, is being examined along with the forensic evidence.



The police watchdog said it was examining CCTV footage of the area, including from buses passing by at the time.



The statement said: "Our investigators will be examining recordings of radio transmissions from both police and London ambulance service, including 999 calls, with a view to tracing further witnesses. We will also be examining any intelligence and surveillance material leading up to the planning of the operation."



The IPCC commissioner Rachel Cerfontyne said: "Any concerns expressed by the wider public about a perceived lack of information from the IPCC should be considered in the context that I am only willing to share information once I have had it independently verified and once the people who are directly involved in this case – including Mr Duggan's family and community leaders – have been fully informed."



An inquest into Duggan's death was opened at north London coroner's court on Tuesday. The coroner, Andrew Walker, adjourned the hearing to 12 December and offered his sympathies to Duggan's family.



"As members of the family will know, in due course there will be an inquest touching the death of Mark Duggan and this is the first stage in that process, he said. "Of course, as well as offering our deepest sympathies, I would like to reassure members of the family that we will be working closely with Mr Duggan's family and the IPCC throughout the process."



After the hearing, the family said they were "distressed" by the rioting in the wake of his death. In a statement on their behalf, Helen Shaw, from the organisation Inquest, said: "The family want everyone to know that the disorder going on has nothing to do with finding out what has happened to Mark. They also want people to know they are deeply distressed by the disorder affecting communities across the country."

King Edward Vii MAD !

His letters and diaries from the 1920s are full of adolescent self-pity and dismal self-disparagement. Never close to his mother and father, he leaned heavily for 16 years on his first long-term mistress, Freda Dudley Ward, the petite and pretty wife of a Liberal MP.




Childlike Edward was obsessed with his weight Writing to her up to three times a day in an invented baby language (‘pleath’ for please and ‘vewy’ for very) , he swore he was going to marry her, fantasised about dying with her and even talked of ‘resigning’.

‘I just don’t feel I can even exist let alone try to live much longer without you, my precious darling beloved little mummie!!’ he groaned.

Sensibly, Freda paid no attention, knowing full well that the nation and the Royal Family would never accept a divorcee as queen.

Was his behaviour normal? The psychologist Simon Baron-Cohen has described how such dependence on a mother figure, as well as some of the prince’s other quirks, are typical characteristics of autism or Asperger’s Syndrome.

Other signs are Edward’s refusal to eat adequately, his liking for violent exercise, his obsessive concern about weight and the thinness of his legs, the way he arranged his clothes in serried rows, his social insensitivity and various nervous tics — such as constantly fiddling with his cuffs.

Flirtatious female: In the early days, Wallis would say to Edward, 'You're just a heartbreak to any woman because you can never marry her'

But during Edward’s lifetime, several of those who worked with him closely went much further: they actually believed the Prince of Wales was mad.

Certainly, the Edward . Lord Wigram, a long-serving courtier, also thought he wasn’t ‘normal and might any day develop into a George III’ — his mad ancestor.



After a conversation with the prince, Wigram was once heard to exclaim: ‘He’s mad — he’s mad! We shall have to lock him up. We shall have to lock him up.’ And later he proposed passing a Regency Bill ‘so that if necessary he could be certified’.



Even the Archbishop of Canterbury considered that Edward was ‘definitely abnormal psychologically if not mentally or physically.’



More crucially, Lord Dawson of Penn, the Royal Family’s doctor, was ‘convinced that [Edward’s] moral development had for some reason been arrested in his adolescence.’



True, some of this opprobrium may be linked to the fact that he failed to take his official duties seriously and was often up all hours at nightclubs, drinking and womanising. But the weight of the evidence suggests that there was more to it than that.



'He's mad! We shall have to lock him up'

Indeed, his extreme fixation with Wallis may have owed more to his mental condition than to true love.



Whatever the case, she was clearly playing with fire. Yet even when she accepted an invitation to stay at the Belvedere Fort for a week without Ernest, she still believed she could string both men along.







Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2023590/The-truth-Mrs-Simpson-Why-Wallis-wanted-marry-king.html#ixzz1UWZ3iAl3

SCIENTOLOGY Ireland FAILS - Revenue drops by 60 percent





Recent documents shows that the Irish Church of Scientology is more than €688,000 in debt, as their revenues have dropped by nearly 60%.

http://www.irishcentral.com/news/Revenue-at-Irish-Church-of-Scientology-drops-by-60-percent-126610713.html

According to the Church of Scientology Mission in Dublin, the company's revenues have dropped from €484,070 to €193,509 in 2009. They would not reveal how much money they made this past year.



Because of the drop, the amount of money that the Church was able to spend freely was €68,29, down from €271,804 in 2008, a 74% difference.



Gerard Ryan, the non-executive director of the Church of Scientology Mission in Dublin, blames the church's financial issues on the recession; he said, “We are not immune to the economic circumstances of the wider community and clearly this has impacted on our fundraising efforts.”



He also blames the debt on a legal case that strained that financially over the period of a few years. To help the Dublin branch out, Ryan explained that the “the deficit has been funded by loans from members of the Church of Scientology worldwide and other Church of Scientology missions,” according to the Irish Times.



These interest-free loans, the directors of the church explain, will be repaid back when they have enough resources to stay stable without the help of them. This all depends on how much surplus they gain in the future; the church makes their revenue yearly by selling DVDs, books, and audio recordings.

________________________

Monday, 8 August 2011

UK National Archive of SCIENTOLOGY cult 1954-1983 - read about enablers of FIDDAMAN delusion

Record Summary



UK National Archive will on August 5th be opening file MEPO 2/10283 :


http://www.blogger.com/goog_1759241057







Scope and content

The Church of Scientology, the Hubbard Association of Scientologists International, and associated organisations: Police enquiries, reports and correspondence; actions brought against Metropolitan Police; information material provided by the Church of Scientology



Covering dates 1954-1983

Held by





The National Archives, Kew



Former reference (Department) 74/68/270; 74/57/1123; 74/66/752; 170/71/210; 170/71/309; 212/54/293; 220/68/334; 231/57/1026; 235/55/696; 235/59/1038; 235/60/463; 235/61/1861

Legal status Public Record(s)

Secret war on the Scientologist 'mafia' launched by Wilson government in 1970s

Secret war on the Scientologist 'mafia' launched by Wilson government in 1970s






The Church of Scientology was considered such a threat to the UK that in 1975 the Government put its members under secret surveillance, according to newly released files.



Previously classified documents reveal that Ministers wanted to undermine and discredit the group because it was said to be ‘mafia-like’ and its activities ‘harmful and evil’.


They believed senior Scientologists were inflicting ‘barbaric’ punishments on followers and drove them away from their families.


The papers show the Government held clandestine meetings to discuss how to reduce the activities of Scientologists in the UK, which included moves to tax the church’s income and turn down visa applications from foreign members.

Today, the Church of Scientology attracts a celebrity following, particularly among Hollywood’s elite. Tom Cruise, Katie Holmes and John Travolta are among its supporters.


However, it has been claimed it is a cult that defrauds its followers by charging them exorbitant fees.

The documents, contained in secret files on Scientology and placed in the National Archives, reveal that in July 1975, the then Home Secretary Roy Jenkins hosted a summit on how best to rid Britain of the group.

Secret base: Scientology's British headquarters at Saint Hill, East Grinstead, Sussex

Ministers of Harold Wilson’s Labour Government agreed to begin undermining the group, and a 1976 document entitled Action To Curb Scientologists reads: ‘Police forces should build up as detailed a composite picture as possible of the organisation’s activities.’


Founding father: L Ron Hubbard, creator of the Church of Scientology

Scientology, founded by American sci-fi author L. Ron Hubbard in 1954, was the subject of much scepticism at the time. A 1968 exclusion order, based on the idea that followers of the so-called religion were ‘socially harmful’, banned foreign members from entering the UK.

In 1975, internal correspondence from the Home Office said: ‘The Church of Scientology does not merely persuade people to part with their money. It is a harmful movement with an evil reputation.’

It classified the group as ‘an organisation designed to make money, and perhaps also to gain power’ which targeted ‘the anxious, the lonely, the inadequate, the credulous and deluded’.

The papers added: ‘It is obtaining large sums of money for its courses on the strength of wild claims that they will cure all sorts of physical and mental ills.’

Further Government material said to be based on Scientology documents claimed there was evidence of abuse.

It says: ‘Members have been imprisoned for 48 hours in a hatch which was too small to allow them to lie down or stand up and a water hose was frequently turned on them.

'Others have been ordered to work for 48 hours in the bowels of a ship in darkness, chipping away rust with a 15-minute break every six hours.’

Prominent members: Tom Cruise and wife Katie Holmes are both Scientologists

One police report sent to Scottish Office Ministers noted: ‘The organisation is mafia-like in its hold on adherents and rarely, if ever, does one relinquish voluntarily his membership.’

The Church of Scientology sent The Mail on Sunday a seven-page response denying the alleged abuses and providing 45 pages of additional information.


Spokesman Graeme Wilson said the archive papers were a ‘snapshot’ of ‘government harassment’, adding: ‘The Government of the United Kingdom owes the Church of Scientology an apology for this atrocious treatment.’









Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2023220/Secret-war-Scientologist-mafia-launched-Harold-Wilson-government-1970s.html#ixzz1UQM1jvPt

Saturday, 6 August 2011

Was Wallis Simpson all woman?

Was Wallis Simpson all woman?


There's been always been speculation about her sexual make-up. Now in a major reassessment her biographer uncovers new evidence 


Recent research suggests that she might well have been born with what’s currently called a Disorder of Sexual Development (DSD) or intersexuality, which affects about 4,000 babies annually in the UK.




Some of its effects are so subtle that, even today, doctors delivering babies with ambiguous genitals cannot be immediately certain if they are holding a boy or a girl.



This does not mean that Wallis was a man, and she was certainly not a freak. In fact, it’s unlikely that she’d have known that anything was wrong, at least for many years.





read on -
http://www.blogger.com/goog_1819782456












Extracted from THAT WOMAN: The Life Of Wallis Simpson, Duchess Of Windsor by Anne Sebba, to be published by Weidenfeld & Nicolson on August 31 at £20. © 2011 Anne Sebba. To order a copy for £16.99 (incl p&p) call 0843 382 0000.




Wednesday, 3 August 2011

Jonathan Djanogly MP takes Seroxat liars to meet prime minister Gordon Brown

Drug group campaigner to meet PM  




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



28th November 2007



Jonathan Djanogly will accompany local drug group campaigner, Janice Simmons, to meet the PM tomorrow.



From the Hunts Post



Prime Minister Gordon Brown is to meet a woman from Huntingdon, who has been campaigning for five years to highlight potential problems with anti-depressants.



Janice Simmons set up the Seroxat User Group in 2002 after discovering that her second husband Jon was addicted to the drug.



Since then thousands of people have contacted her website and the group has provided information to people from all over the world.



Mrs Simmons, 58, a grandmother from Great Stukeley, will travel to Downing Street tomorrow (Thursday), accompanied by Huntingdon MP Jonathan Djanogly and Dr Paul Duckett, from Manchester ­University.



She told The Hunts Post: "I never believed we would get this far. Our MP, Jonathan Djanogly, wrote to Tony Blair in July and we received the invite last week."



Mrs Simmons said there is a long list of demands on their shopping list and her group wants:



■To know why - four years since it started - the investigation into GlaxoSmithKline is still ongoing. The MHRA, (the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency, the body that regulates medicines), is investigating an allegation that GSK withheld information on Seroxat having a higher suicide risk for under 18s. GSK denies this, saying Seroxat was never licensed for children.

■Why a recommendation from a Health Select Committee report in 2005 - which said that the MHRA should become an independent body - has not been implemented.

■The group wants the MHRA to look at independent information about particular drugs - rather than accept information from drug companies.

■Better enforcement of guidelines from NICE (the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) which state that anti-depressants should not be used as a first-line treatment for mild depression.

■The user group says information from its members indicates that many GPs have not heard of the MHRA or the Yellow Card warning system. This is a yellow card doctors and patients are advised to complete to report the side effects of the drugs.

Mrs Simmons set up the group after seeing the addiction of her husband.



Six years before they met, Jon and his first wife were prescribed anti-depressants when their marriage broke down. Jon's wife committed suicide within three weeks of being put on Prozac while 16 years on, Jon is still dependant on anti-depressants.



The Seroxat User Group will also remind Mr Brown that more support groups and funding are needed to help patients trying to withdraw from anti-depressants. "

http://www.jonathandjanogly.com/content/drug-group-campaigner-meet-pm

Tuesday, 2 August 2011

Indian man has hysterectomy after doctors find uterus - FIDDAMAN counterpoint blog

The Indian man, identified as Ryalu, was admitted to a hospital near Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, after complaining of severe stomach pains.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/8675043/Indian-man-has-hysterectomy-after-doctors-find-uterus.html

Doctors suspected a normal hernia, but when they carried out an exploratory operation they were shocked to discover it had been caused by a female uterus, ovaries, Fallopian tubes, a cervix and underdeveloped vaginal tissue.



Dr Pramod Kumar Shrivastava, a surgeon at the Chhindwara district hospital said the patient had external male organs, was fit from working in the fields, and lived a normal life.



"Usually the contents of the Hernia Sac are abdomen organs like large intestines and small intestines but when we operated on the patient we were surprised to find female reproductive organs. We have removed the organs through a hysterectomy and repaired the hernia.



"The sac contained quite developed uterus, both the ovaries, Fallopian tubes, cervix and a tissue which is undeveloped but apparently looks like vaginal tissue," he explained.




The man had not suffered any problems until the stomach pains which led him to hospital. Although he is medically a hermaphrodite, his hormones and sexuality are clearly male, he said.



"The external reproductive organs of the patient were masculine and he has no problems whatsoever with his sexuality. He had functional male genitals and there was no formation of breasts in the patient. It's an embryological accident at the time of embryonic formation," he said.



The patient, who was said to be as "stunned" as his doctors at the discovery, is recovering in hospital and is being supported by his family.