http://tweetmeme.com/story/183200452/bob-fiddaman-seroxat-and-scientology-why-we-protest-activism-forum
tweet retweet Stumbled on these when looking for other stuff :SEROXAT SUFFERERS - STAND UP AND BE
Thursday, 8 October 2009
uksurvivors : Message: Seroxat lawyer gives massive donation to Super Power Project
uksurvivors : Message: Seroxat lawyer gives massive donation to Super Power Project: "Seroxat lawyer gives massive donation to Super Power Project"
http://forums.whyweprotest.net/291-scientology-discussion/bob-fiddaman-seroxat-scientology-53313/
Cornerstone Newsletter [circa August 2007] Super Power Project ...
10 posts - 7 authors - Last post: 23 Oct 2007
The Cornerstone Newsletter is published a few times ..... George Murgatroyd Marie Murillo Joeri & Felicitas Murk Robert Musack ...
www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?t=2210 -
http://forums.whyweprotest.net/291-scientology-discussion/bob-fiddaman-seroxat-scientology-53313/
Cornerstone Newsletter [circa August 2007] Super Power Project ...
10 posts - 7 authors - Last post: 23 Oct 2007
The Cornerstone Newsletter is published a few times ..... George Murgatroyd Marie Murillo Joeri & Felicitas Murk Robert Musack ...
www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?t=2210 -
Bob Fiddaman, Seroxat and Scientology
Bob Fiddaman, Seroxat and Scientology
http://forums.whyweprotest.net/291-scientology-discussion/bob-fiddaman-seroxat-scientology-53313/
Seroxat lawyer listed as a Scientology Auditor as early as 1982
Scientology Clear List, Auditor 179, circa September 1982
http://www.truthaboutscientology.com/stats/clears/auditor_179.html
http://forums.whyweprotest.net/291-scientology-discussion/bob-fiddaman-seroxat-scientology-53313/
Wednesday, 7 October 2009
How much is Seroxat withdrawal claim worth when a COPD death negotiated by Hugh James = £1250?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/uksurvivors/message/49418
Complaints made by Mrs Evans In 2001 Mrs Evans made multiple complaints to the Law Society against the solicitors (Hugh James in Merther Tydfil) who handled her compensation claim for respiratory disease in respect of her late father William John Thomas.
http://careinwales.blogspot.com/2009/10/corrupt-law-firm-hugh-james-of-cardiff_06.html
The Adjudication Panel raised Mrs Evans' compensation from £1,250-£5,000. Hugh James challenged the decision by way of Judicial Review Throughout the dispute Mrs Evans kept the Department (through its external lawyers Nabarro) appraised of her case and she also sent copies of the Law Society's report and findings to Sir Michael Turner, the Judge then overseeing the COPD scheme.
Complaints made by Mrs Evans In 2001 Mrs Evans made multiple complaints to the Law Society against the solicitors (Hugh James in Merther Tydfil) who handled her compensation claim for respiratory disease in respect of her late father William John Thomas.
http://careinwales.blogspot.com/2009/10/corrupt-law-firm-hugh-james-of-cardiff_06.html
The Adjudication Panel raised Mrs Evans' compensation from £1,250-£5,000. Hugh James challenged the decision by way of Judicial Review Throughout the dispute Mrs Evans kept the Department (through its external lawyers Nabarro) appraised of her case and she also sent copies of the Law Society's report and findings to Sir Michael Turner, the Judge then overseeing the COPD scheme.
Tuesday, 6 October 2009
Corrupt law firm Hugh James of Cardiff - faced Parliamentary FRAUD probe
Question 90 (Mr Austin Mitchell): Indications of fraud in the case of Mrs Ann Elizabeth Evans
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmpubacc/350/7102210.htm
The Committee requested a note explaining the case of Mrs Evans. The Department has reviewed the history of the issues raised by Mrs Evans.
Complaints made by Mrs Evans In 2001 Mrs Evans made multiple complaints to the Law Society against the solicitors (Hugh James in Merther Tydfil) who handled her compensation claim for respiratory disease in respect of her late father William John Thomas. The various documents attached to Mrs Evans' letter outline the complaints made. In particular Mrs Evans alleged that her solicitors had:
— delayed in "registering" Mrs Thomas' claim until May 1998;
— failed to make a timely application for an interim payment;
— failed to respond to individual letters and telephone calls;
— delayed in providing costs and client care information;
— provided advice and information that was confusing;
— failed to apply appropriate supervision to junior staff; and
— altered the claims form (claim questionnaire) without her knowledge or consent, in a way that artificially inflated the value of the claim.
Appeal to Law Society
Mrs Evans appealed the Law Society's original decision and this was reviewed by the Adjudication Panel and their ruling was handed down on 22 June 2005. The upshot being that Mrs Evans' appeal was upheld and two partners at Hugh James each received a severe personal reprimand from the Law Society in respect of their failure to properly supervise their staff. Additionally, it is clear from the Law Society's findings that the only reason a finding of misconduct had not been made is that (by reason of the poor supervision) it was not possible to identify the individual at Hugh James guilty of the misconduct. The Adjudication Panel raised Mrs Evans' compensation from £1,250-£5,000. Hugh James challenged the decision by way of Judicial Review Throughout the dispute Mrs Evans kept the Department (through its external lawyers Nabarro) appraised of her case and she also sent copies of the Law Society's report and findings to Sir Michael Turner, the Judge then overseeing the COPD scheme.
Department's consideration of the position
The Department carefully considered the issues raised, especially in terms of potential impact on the wider administration of the schemes. The main issue being the Law Society's finding that Hugh James Solicitors had altered Mrs Evans' claim questionnaire form. Furthermore, the nature of the supervisory failures by Hugh James Solicitors ("...monitoring individual files by computer screen and monitoring DTI statistics...") raised concern that these failures were not limited to Mrs Evans' case alone. It was also apparent that the two partners were two out of five members of the Co-ordinating Group (CG) of solicitors representing the claimants under the scheme.
A range of actions were undertaken:
— Nabarro (the Department's legal advisers) held a full meeting with Mrs Evans on 29 June 2004;
— a request was put to Capita's Security Investigation Department (SID) to filter out similar type cases intimated via Hugh James Solicitors for analysis;
— a letter dated 7 September 2005 was sent to the Senior Partner at Hugh James Solicitors requesting a full written explanation and detailing the organisational failures which have led to the findings against them, together with details of what changes have been made, in light of those findings; and
— a copy of the letter to Hugh James Solicitors was copied to a member of the Claimant's Group, suggesting that the CG should raise the issue at the next Review Hearing and address the issue in its written report to the Court.
Current position
As far as the Department is aware the case remains subject to ongoing review by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). In these circumstances the Department is not currently in a position to take further action.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmpubacc/350/7102210.htm
The Committee requested a note explaining the case of Mrs Evans. The Department has reviewed the history of the issues raised by Mrs Evans.
Complaints made by Mrs Evans In 2001 Mrs Evans made multiple complaints to the Law Society against the solicitors (Hugh James in Merther Tydfil) who handled her compensation claim for respiratory disease in respect of her late father William John Thomas. The various documents attached to Mrs Evans' letter outline the complaints made. In particular Mrs Evans alleged that her solicitors had:
— delayed in "registering" Mrs Thomas' claim until May 1998;
— failed to make a timely application for an interim payment;
— failed to respond to individual letters and telephone calls;
— delayed in providing costs and client care information;
— provided advice and information that was confusing;
— failed to apply appropriate supervision to junior staff; and
— altered the claims form (claim questionnaire) without her knowledge or consent, in a way that artificially inflated the value of the claim.
Appeal to Law Society
Mrs Evans appealed the Law Society's original decision and this was reviewed by the Adjudication Panel and their ruling was handed down on 22 June 2005. The upshot being that Mrs Evans' appeal was upheld and two partners at Hugh James each received a severe personal reprimand from the Law Society in respect of their failure to properly supervise their staff. Additionally, it is clear from the Law Society's findings that the only reason a finding of misconduct had not been made is that (by reason of the poor supervision) it was not possible to identify the individual at Hugh James guilty of the misconduct. The Adjudication Panel raised Mrs Evans' compensation from £1,250-£5,000. Hugh James challenged the decision by way of Judicial Review Throughout the dispute Mrs Evans kept the Department (through its external lawyers Nabarro) appraised of her case and she also sent copies of the Law Society's report and findings to Sir Michael Turner, the Judge then overseeing the COPD scheme.
Department's consideration of the position
The Department carefully considered the issues raised, especially in terms of potential impact on the wider administration of the schemes. The main issue being the Law Society's finding that Hugh James Solicitors had altered Mrs Evans' claim questionnaire form. Furthermore, the nature of the supervisory failures by Hugh James Solicitors ("...monitoring individual files by computer screen and monitoring DTI statistics...") raised concern that these failures were not limited to Mrs Evans' case alone. It was also apparent that the two partners were two out of five members of the Co-ordinating Group (CG) of solicitors representing the claimants under the scheme.
A range of actions were undertaken:
— Nabarro (the Department's legal advisers) held a full meeting with Mrs Evans on 29 June 2004;
— a request was put to Capita's Security Investigation Department (SID) to filter out similar type cases intimated via Hugh James Solicitors for analysis;
— a letter dated 7 September 2005 was sent to the Senior Partner at Hugh James Solicitors requesting a full written explanation and detailing the organisational failures which have led to the findings against them, together with details of what changes have been made, in light of those findings; and
— a copy of the letter to Hugh James Solicitors was copied to a member of the Claimant's Group, suggesting that the CG should raise the issue at the next Review Hearing and address the issue in its written report to the Court.
Current position
As far as the Department is aware the case remains subject to ongoing review by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). In these circumstances the Department is not currently in a position to take further action.
Oct 2002 Fiddaman was going to start up support group for people who are suffering Seroxat withdrawal - SO WHERE IS IT BOB?
Oct 7 2002 Fid said -
I am thinking of starting up a support group for people who are suffering
severe withdrawal symptoms with the anti - depressant drug, Seroxat, also
known as 'Paroxetine' and 'Paxil.'
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.politics.drugs/browse_thread/thread/844ece791be6d457/ad75dcb52498e08e?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=seroxat
I have been on the drug myself for over 5 years and have tried
unsuccessfully to taper myself off due to severe side effects.
The company that make the drug, GLAXO, SMITHKLIEN have refused to admit that
Seroxat is addictive and this has resulted in a lawsuit against the company
with almost 1000 users here in the UK.
Countless correspondence to the MCA and GSK have proved fruitless.
BBC's Panorama programme is due to air on the 13th of October (though this
may yet be pulled, such is the power of the MCA) to raise the issue of the
addictiveness of Seroxat and all the evidence that has been collected to
suggest that this drug should never have been launched. Evidence such as GSK
suppressed the trial data from the 1980's that claimed that 85% of
participents suffered severe adverse reactions, withdrawal symptoms and
dependence after only 12 week studies.
The Medicines Control Agency goes out of its way to be unhelpful, and its
advisory committee the CSM (Committee on Safety of Medicines) have shares
and other financial dealings with Glaxo SmithKline and a number of other
large pharmaceutical companies, which is a serious conflict of interest, and
one that should not be permitted.
I would therefore like to ask you if you could ask your readers if anyone
has experienced difficulties with the drug 'Seroxat' to contact me at
fi...@blueyonder.co.uk.
If you need to telephone me to discuss this matter further then I can be
contacted on
Yours sincerely
Bob Fiddaman
I am thinking of starting up a support group for people who are suffering
severe withdrawal symptoms with the anti - depressant drug, Seroxat, also
known as 'Paroxetine' and 'Paxil.'
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.politics.drugs/browse_thread/thread/844ece791be6d457/ad75dcb52498e08e?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=seroxat
I have been on the drug myself for over 5 years and have tried
unsuccessfully to taper myself off due to severe side effects.
The company that make the drug, GLAXO, SMITHKLIEN have refused to admit that
Seroxat is addictive and this has resulted in a lawsuit against the company
with almost 1000 users here in the UK.
Countless correspondence to the MCA and GSK have proved fruitless.
BBC's Panorama programme is due to air on the 13th of October (though this
may yet be pulled, such is the power of the MCA) to raise the issue of the
addictiveness of Seroxat and all the evidence that has been collected to
suggest that this drug should never have been launched. Evidence such as GSK
suppressed the trial data from the 1980's that claimed that 85% of
participents suffered severe adverse reactions, withdrawal symptoms and
dependence after only 12 week studies.
The Medicines Control Agency goes out of its way to be unhelpful, and its
advisory committee the CSM (Committee on Safety of Medicines) have shares
and other financial dealings with Glaxo SmithKline and a number of other
large pharmaceutical companies, which is a serious conflict of interest, and
one that should not be permitted.
I would therefore like to ask you if you could ask your readers if anyone
has experienced difficulties with the drug 'Seroxat' to contact me at
fi...@blueyonder.co.uk.
If you need to telephone me to discuss this matter further then I can be
contacted on
Yours sincerely
Bob Fiddaman
Monday, 5 October 2009
uksurvivors : Message: Seroxat / Paxil rats were given over 500 times recomended dose
uksurvivors : Message: Seroxat / Paxil rats were given over 500 times recomended dose: "example -
Human female body weight (70) devided by rat female body weight (0.3) multiplied by 50mgs (rat) dose / 20 mgs typical human dose
70/.3 x (50/20) = 583
http://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/paxil_birth_defect_trials/kilker_transcripts/091509_am_opening_statements.pdf"
Human female body weight (70) devided by rat female body weight (0.3) multiplied by 50mgs (rat) dose / 20 mgs typical human dose
70/.3 x (50/20) = 583
http://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/paxil_birth_defect_trials/kilker_transcripts/091509_am_opening_statements.pdf"
Seroxat (Paxil) birth defect trial - Baum Hedlund show that (0.3kg) rat mother was actually given up to 50mgs of Seroxat !!
transcript -
http://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/paxil_birth_defect_trials/kilker_transcripts/091509_am_opening_statements.pdf
Ferrosan had done the preliminary
20 animal studies to look at teratogenicity. And
21 they were done, I believe, in 1979 and 1980.
22 And one of the studies was called
23 Study 295. This is a study where they give
24 Paxil, paroxetine, to pregnant female rats.
And what the evidence showed in Study 295 is
2 that the rats that got no Paxil, 88 percent of
3 them were alive or 12 percent were dead by the
4 fourth day after they were born. The ones that
5 were given 5 milligrams of Paxil, 65 percent
6 were dead by day 4. The ones that were dosed
7 with 15 milligrams of Paxil, 92 percent were
8 dead by day 4. And in the ones that were given
9 50 milligrams of Paxil, 100 percent were dead
10 by the fourth day after they were born
http://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/paxil_birth_defect_trials/kilker_transcripts/091509_am_opening_statements.pdf
Ferrosan had done the preliminary
20 animal studies to look at teratogenicity. And
21 they were done, I believe, in 1979 and 1980.
22 And one of the studies was called
23 Study 295. This is a study where they give
24 Paxil, paroxetine, to pregnant female rats.
And what the evidence showed in Study 295 is
2 that the rats that got no Paxil, 88 percent of
3 them were alive or 12 percent were dead by the
4 fourth day after they were born. The ones that
5 were given 5 milligrams of Paxil, 65 percent
6 were dead by day 4. The ones that were dosed
7 with 15 milligrams of Paxil, 92 percent were
8 dead by day 4. And in the ones that were given
9 50 milligrams of Paxil, 100 percent were dead
10 by the fourth day after they were born
Paxil (Seroxat) birth defect trial - Baum Hedlund show that of rats who were given NO Seroxat/Paxil 12% of the pups died - what from Bob ?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/uksurvivors/message/49283
transcript -
Ferrosan had done the preliminary
20 animal studies to look at teratogenicity. And
21 they were done, I believe, in 1979 and 1980.
22 And one of the studies was called
23 Study 295. This is a study where they give
24 Paxil, paroxetine, to pregnant female rats.
25 And what the evidence showed in Study 295 is
1
2 that the rats that got no Paxil, 88 percent of
3 them were alive or 12 percent were dead by the
4 fourth day after they were born. The ones that
http://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/paxil_birth_defect_trials/kilker_transcripts/091509_am_opening_statements.pdf
Sunday, 4 October 2009
Corrupt law firm Hugh James of Cardiff sets up new blog - "Care in Wales"
Seroxat withdrawal – Court set deadline for compensation claims
http://careinwales.wordpress.com/2009/09/24/seroxat-withdrawal-court-set-deadline-for-compensation-claims/
September 24, 2009 — careinwales
Have you had difficulties withdrawing from the anti-depressant drug Seroxat? Have you found it impossible to withdraw from it? Are you having difficulties in withdrawing from Seroxat now?
The High Court made a Group Litigation Order in relation to the Group Action brought by around 500 individuals alleging harm from problems withdrawing from Seroxat.
On 19 May 2009 the High Court ordered that any individual who wishes to pursue a compensation claim must join the Group Action before 15 January 2010.
All individuals must have their claim investigated before they can join the action and so they need to come forward ASAP.
Register your interest now, call the Seroxat team at Hugh James, designated as lead solicitors for the purposes of the Group Litigation order, on 029 20 785 971 or go to www.hughjames.com/seroxat
The Group Register will close on 15 January 2010 and any individuals who have not joined at that date may lose their opportunity to be part of the litigation.
You should not stop taking medication without consulting your doctor.
For more information go to www.hughjames.com/seroxat
http://careinwales.wordpress.com/2009/09/24/seroxat-withdrawal-court-set-deadline-for-compensation-claims/
September 24, 2009 — careinwales
Have you had difficulties withdrawing from the anti-depressant drug Seroxat? Have you found it impossible to withdraw from it? Are you having difficulties in withdrawing from Seroxat now?
The High Court made a Group Litigation Order in relation to the Group Action brought by around 500 individuals alleging harm from problems withdrawing from Seroxat.
On 19 May 2009 the High Court ordered that any individual who wishes to pursue a compensation claim must join the Group Action before 15 January 2010.
All individuals must have their claim investigated before they can join the action and so they need to come forward ASAP.
Register your interest now, call the Seroxat team at Hugh James, designated as lead solicitors for the purposes of the Group Litigation order, on 029 20 785 971 or go to www.hughjames.com/seroxat
The Group Register will close on 15 January 2010 and any individuals who have not joined at that date may lose their opportunity to be part of the litigation.
You should not stop taking medication without consulting your doctor.
For more information go to www.hughjames.com/seroxat
Cervarix does not prevent 30% cancer, does it prevent the other 70%?
Dr Harper, of the University of Missouri-Kansas, said
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/uksurvivors/message/49259
She also believes the benefits of the vaccine as a 'cure' are being exaggerated. The jab does not prevent 30 per cent of cervical cancers - which means women will still need to be screened for pre-cancerous lesions
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1217280/Cervical-cancer-jab-Natalie-Morton-died-chest-tumour-vaccine.html#ixzz0SzH5pkNA
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/uksurvivors/message/49259
She also believes the benefits of the vaccine as a 'cure' are being exaggerated. The jab does not prevent 30 per cent of cervical cancers - which means women will still need to be screened for pre-cancerous lesions
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1217280/Cervical-cancer-jab-Natalie-Morton-died-chest-tumour-vaccine.html#ixzz0SzH5pkNA
Seroxat - My Violent Obsession (Boost Records)
Artist: Seroxat
Title: My Violent Obsession
Label: Boost Records
Format: CD
Release: October/2009
Catalog: BRCD01
Track list:
1.Endless Stream
2.Goddamn Noize
3.Panic Attack
4.Breathe In
5.Feels Like
6.Inside My Head
7.More I Know
8.Cryptomnesia
9.Wishes
Boost Records is proud to present Seroxat long awaited album "My violent obbsession"!
Five years since the debut album "Brutal Beats" has been released,and now Seroxat is surprising us
again with a new masterpiece.
9 Artistic tracks that range from psychedelic trance music
to heavy metal guitar riffs , Break beat to classical music And top notch vocals.
Some of the highlights in this masterpiece includes the hit "Panic Attack" which has already
been tested on dance floors all over the world.
"Breathe In" Which combines Psytrance with Opera and classical music.
"Feels like",a pure psychedelic break beat track with a bad ass rhythm!
"Wishes", the closing track of the album is a brilliant down tempo tune ,combining talented piano playing
along angelic voices and raw guitars, which sounds genius all together .
These are only a few of the tracks featured on this amazing new album.
Seroxat's new album is showing us that he matured through the years into a very talented artist who knows how to make smart music and uses many different genres and styles.
This is a must album to everyone who appreciates high quality,well produced sounds , and genuine music .
The album will be for available sale at http://www.beatspace.com
Friday, 2 October 2009
Paxil - Seroxat birth defect trial. "The plaintiffs NOT entitled to see Paxil study raw data !
"The plaintiffs are entitled to correspondence and documents between anyone at Slone and GSK about the study, its scope" and methodology, the judge concluded...
Gertner denied the family's request to access the study's raw data. The judge ordered Boston University researchers Allen Mitchell and Carol Louik to turn over other information about their contacts with the drugmaker.
6c907d24-6dd8-4212-bbe7-1d106ecafb41[2].doc
Gertner denied the family's request to access the study's raw data. The judge ordered Boston University researchers Allen Mitchell and Carol Louik to turn over other information about their contacts with the drugmaker.
6c907d24-6dd8-4212-bbe7-1d106ecafb41[2].doc
uksurvivors : Message: Kilker - not entitled to see Paxil raw data
uksurvivors : Message: Kilker - not entitled to see Paxil raw data: "Kilker - not entitled to see Paxil raw data"
Bob Fiddaman makes it clear that - Yes (Seroxat) helps some people
http://acupuncture.vitalis.co.nz/2004/07/whats-better-than-aropax-or-prozac-who.html
Yes, it helps some people but more and more people are coming forward now with their horror stories.
Anyway, enough of the chat.
Yes, it helps some people but more and more people are coming forward now with their horror stories.
Anyway, enough of the chat.
Thursday, 1 October 2009
Seroxat - Hugh James news from Paxilprogress
UK lawyer taking on GSK
http://www.paxilprogress.org/forums/showthread.php?t=44291
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Has anyone heard about this UK lawyer(Hugh James) that is taking on GSK. for people using seroxat?
I have spoken to them and they have sent me an information pack.. It is mostly about people having problems with withdrawl. Loads of Questions and such..
Just wondering cos there are so many questions...and if anyone else is going to give ut a go?
I saw the advertisment for it in The Guardian Newspaper.
Cheers
Dan
http://www.paxilprogress.org/forums/showthread.php?t=44291
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Has anyone heard about this UK lawyer(Hugh James) that is taking on GSK. for people using seroxat?
I have spoken to them and they have sent me an information pack.. It is mostly about people having problems with withdrawl. Loads of Questions and such..
Just wondering cos there are so many questions...and if anyone else is going to give ut a go?
I saw the advertisment for it in The Guardian Newspaper.
Cheers
Dan
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)