Blustering Fiddaman reply -"Let's say, we cannot be sure what caused the deaths in the rats,.."

Let's say, we cannot be sure what caused the deaths in the rats, let's say that


data, destroyed by a third party [according to GSK] would show us the possible

cause of death. Let's say that you, your daughter or your girlfriend was armed

with this knowledge before taking Seroxat. Would you be happy for your pregnant

daughter or girlfriend to take Seroxat?



Remember, the rat studies were not directed by GSK, in fact it was one of GSK's

scientists that discovered in the 1980's that the rat studies suggested Paxil

"could be" a cause of birth defects. Glaxo refused for almost 20 years to do

studies on why the young rats died. Why?



Do your homework and check out GSK's own 1998 internal review, you will see that

officials found "an alarmingly high number" of birth-defect reports with Seroxat

yet the report was never turned over to the FDA. Why?



Judging by your defence and obvious support of GSK, one would assume that you

would be prepared to stand by and let your pregnant daughter or girlfriend

administer Seroxat, am I right?



If the rat studies are so 'unimportant' - why hide them?



Something for you to ponder Jeremy before your next cut and paste job on here.



Fid



http://groups.yahoo.com/group/uksurvivors/message/48996