blogs created to prevent or detect a crime http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1997/ukpga_19970040_en_1

This blog is brougt to you consistent with subsection 3 of the Protection from Harassment Act - i.e. blogs created to prevent or detect a crime http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1997/ukpga_19970040_en_1



Monday 24 October 2011

Emory Psychiatrist in conflict of interests - Douglas Bremner approached directly & funded by Roaccutane litigant Liam Grant

Doug Bremner:


" In 1997, Liam Grant’s son, an Irish student, hanged himself. Grant filed a lawsuit in Ireland against Roche, which makes Accutane, charging that the drug led to the suicide. He also started a foundation to support research. There have been several other cases in which the drug was associated with suicide. Around the time of Grant’s suicide, France issued a warning to that effect, before the U.S. warning came out. Grant [senior] contacted me and asked if I could do some research. I said I would need money for the brain scans, and he agreed to fund them; he also funded a rat study done elsewhere. Both studies showed that Accutane affected the limbic area of the brain, which affects emotion. Accutane inhibits nerve growth in the hippocampus, which in animal models causes depression. It’s not a subtle thing. In 2000, the son of Congressman Bart Stupak, who was taking Accutane, shot himself and died. Stupak put pressure on the FDA, which concluded there was good evidence that the drug caused suicides. That’s why my study and the rat study were such big deals. In the Grant case, the defense counsel subpoenaed Emory to get my study data, and I’ve been named as an expert witness in most of the lawsuits that are going on. We’re doing additional studies, and the manufacturer is trying to subpoena those records even before they’re done. They’ve already deposed me to try and find out what I’m doing, but I refused to tell them. It’s now up to a judge to say whether he wants to compel me to reveal that information. ....."



http://www.emory.edu/ACAD_EXCHANGE/2007/febmar/bremnerqa.html
 
 
AE: Has Roche charged you with bias because your work is sponsored by the plaintiff?




DB: Drug companies are really good at propaganda and spin control. They’ll throw up balloons that are distracting and give you a piece of the information. In Ireland, there are relatively low limits on product liability awards, so Liam Grant’s not doing this for financial gain. I don’t communicate with Grant anymore, because every time I do the emails get subpoenaed. I’ve never even met him. His donation was given as an unrestricted grant to Emory, and my time was never compensated. The day after my study came out, Roche attempted to settle with him and offered to pay all legal costs and for the research he’d paid for, which totaled several million dollars. He refused. Roche’s line has been that there’s no association between Accutane and depression, and that depression is really common in teenagers. Most of these cases involve teenagers. The fact is that teens have one of the lowest suicide rates, so that’s another piece of propaganda they’ve effectively spun, and it’s just not true. Another line is that Accutane can’t enter the brain because it’s a skin medication. It does go into the brain. In fact it exists naturally in the body. We make Accutane, which has the same chemical structure as the active form of vitamin A, which has all sorts of functions in the brain.



No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.