From: matthew.holford@hotmail.co.uk
To: fiddaman64@blueyonder.co.uk;
Subject: RE: Dear all
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008
Oh, and one other thing: Bryce, if Bryce it is, doesn't often identify himself, so, truth be told, one doesn't really know who one is being attacked by, even though the modus operandi, language, etc, are familiar. For example, I don't think that blog is identified as being authored by Bryce, and although it's been assumed that "Sara xx," on those Furious Seasons threads, was Bryce, we don't know that for sure, either. This creates uncertainty, in one's mind, but only because one feels inclined to attack back, in the same way. Don't, it doesn't work, as a methodology. Instead, deal with what has been said, and convey one's message as succinctly as possibly, preferably conveying your complete and utter boredom with the subject matter. Bryce, if Bryce it is, says the same thing, again and again and again. You only have to rebut, once, and then I suggest that you refine your rebuttal - that is, do what he does, which is repeat yourself, over and over and over again. He will either give up, or you will get some movement. If he won't state his objective, such that you can decide whether you wish to argue towards it, then I don't see what else you can do. Matt
To: fiddaman64@blueyonder.co.uk;
Subject: RE: Dear all
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008
Oh, and one other thing: Bryce, if Bryce it is, doesn't often identify himself, so, truth be told, one doesn't really know who one is being attacked by, even though the modus operandi, language, etc, are familiar. For example, I don't think that blog is identified as being authored by Bryce, and although it's been assumed that "Sara xx," on those Furious Seasons threads, was Bryce, we don't know that for sure, either. This creates uncertainty, in one's mind, but only because one feels inclined to attack back, in the same way. Don't, it doesn't work, as a methodology. Instead, deal with what has been said, and convey one's message as succinctly as possibly, preferably conveying your complete and utter boredom with the subject matter. Bryce, if Bryce it is, says the same thing, again and again and again. You only have to rebut, once, and then I suggest that you refine your rebuttal - that is, do what he does, which is repeat yourself, over and over and over again. He will either give up, or you will get some movement. If he won't state his objective, such that you can decide whether you wish to argue towards it, then I don't see what else you can do. Matt
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.