blogs created to prevent or detect a crime http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1997/ukpga_19970040_en_1

This blog is brougt to you consistent with subsection 3 of the Protection from Harassment Act - i.e. blogs created to prevent or detect a crime http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1997/ukpga_19970040_en_1



Wednesday, 15 July 2009

Matt Holford said "I don't think that blog is identified as being authored by Bryce"


From: matthew.holford@hotmail.co.uk
To: fiddaman64@blueyonder.co.uk;
Subject: RE: Dear all
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008

Oh, and one other thing: Bryce, if Bryce it is, doesn't often identify himself, so, truth be told, one doesn't really know who one is being attacked by, even though the modus operandi, language, etc, are familiar. For example, I don't think that blog is identified as being authored by Bryce, and although it's been assumed that "Sara xx," on those Furious Seasons threads, was Bryce, we don't know that for sure, either. This creates uncertainty, in one's mind, but only because one feels inclined to attack back, in the same way. Don't, it doesn't work, as a methodology. Instead, deal with what has been said, and convey one's message as succinctly as possibly, preferably conveying your complete and utter boredom with the subject matter. Bryce, if Bryce it is, says the same thing, again and again and again. You only have to rebut, once, and then I suggest that you refine your rebuttal - that is, do what he does, which is repeat yourself, over and over and over again. He will either give up, or you will get some movement. If he won't state his objective, such that you can decide whether you wish to argue towards it, then I don't see what else you can do. Matt

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.