In October, 2010 the solicitors in charge of the case considered there was insufficient evidence to proceed and advised the litigants to discontinue their claims. Approximately two thirds of the litigants followed this advice. I, along with others, decided to continue the case, despite being told that we may be liable for costs.
A meeting with the Legal Services Commission's Special Committee Review Panel was convened and a barrister and claimant in the Seroxat litigation, along with myself and others, presented evidence as to why we felt the funding should be continued. At no point was the funding discontinued, the meeting with the Legal Services Comission was to decide whether or not it should be.
extract from - http://fiddaman.blogspot.com/2012/01/uk-seroxat-litigation-current-status.html
read in full here - http://fiddaman.blogspot.com/2012/01/uk-seroxat-litigation-current-status.html
A meeting with the Legal Services Commission's Special Committee Review Panel was convened and a barrister and claimant in the Seroxat litigation, along with myself and others, presented evidence as to why we felt the funding should be continued. At no point was the funding discontinued, the meeting with the Legal Services Comission was to decide whether or not it should be.
extract from - http://fiddaman.blogspot.com/2012/01/uk-seroxat-litigation-current-status.html
read in full here - http://fiddaman.blogspot.com/2012/01/uk-seroxat-litigation-current-status.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.