blogs created to prevent or detect a crime http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1997/ukpga_19970040_en_1

This blog is brougt to you consistent with subsection 3 of the Protection from Harassment Act - i.e. blogs created to prevent or detect a crime http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1997/ukpga_19970040_en_1



Tuesday, 20 October 2009

Seroxat - Hugh James not litigating on the issue of side effects, but only on withdrawal !!!

Hi pboy
http://www.paxilprogress.org/forums/showthread.php?t=44291
I spoke to a guy at Hugh James the other day. They are based in Cardiff like me, funnily enough.
For some reason there is a 10 year cut off. I don't quite understand why - if anyone can explain I'd be grateful. He also said (he was patient and helpful) that they are not litigating on the issue of side effects, but on withdrawal symptoms. I have to confess that I didn't understand the distinction completely.
As I started over 10 years ago and he felt my symptoms came from side effects, he didn't feel I could be represented.
He was very nice, but I must admit I was confused by the legalities of it all.
You are within the time-frame though, so I would ring them. Check this link:
http://www.hughjames.com/our_service...roxatinfo.aspx
Good luck.

Si
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)