blogs created to prevent or detect a crime http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1997/ukpga_19970040_en_1

This blog is brougt to you consistent with subsection 3 of the Protection from Harassment Act - i.e. blogs created to prevent or detect a crime http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1997/ukpga_19970040_en_1



Wednesday, 4 April 2012

SEROXAT lawyers Hugh James - drop most clients because problems NOT caused by SEROXAT - fakes like FIDDAMAN

Mr Harvey says his 1,700 clients are of different age groups and were selected from about 4,000 people who contacted the firm with complaints about the drug. "We have screened the complainants carefully so as to include only those whose symptoms we strongly feel have been brought on by the use of the drug," he said.Mr Harvey is bringing the claim under the Consumer Protection Act 1987. The claimants allege withdrawal problems and/or aggression and/or suicidal acts. Mr Harvey thinks the case will take at least two years to get to trial. Funding comes from a mixture of public funds and from legal insurance policies.Mr Harvey says he has never called for Seroxat to be withdrawn. "It's a question of proper, informed choice. If doctors and patients are told the risks involved they can make an informed choice about whether to use the drug or not."Mr Harvey said he could not say what scale of damages he would be looking for.










http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/glaxo-faces-threat-of-uk-class-action-over-seroxat-676179.html

SSRI suicidal thoughts is a Class Phenomenon - but SEROXAT lawyers FAILED to take ANY form of action FIDDAMAN





Note also how Harvey further spun when he said






"It is noteworthy however that the original MHRA, EMEA and FDA investigations of SSRIs arose as a direct result of the focus on Seroxat and Paxil by the litigators both here and in the US and the media "







Economical with the truth as ever, Harvey, of Hugh James, forgets to mention the PROZAC litigation from 1990's, instigated by Scientology /CCHR LA, which also ended in failure.





The patients are ill served by these lawyers who dine out on their suffering - the evidence is clear SSRI's are more out of control than ever !



http://bobfiddaman.blogspot.com/2011/09/scientology-cchr-la-instigates-ssri.html

Tuesday, 3 April 2012

PROZAC - plaintiffs have presented no affirmative evidence showing there is a genuine issue of material fact 1992 FIDDAMAN

Judge Benjamin F. Shobe wrote in his order



Although afforded ample opportunity, plaintiffs have presented no affirmative evidence showing there is a genuine issue of material fact


(From “Eli Lilly cleared in Prozac Lawsuit,” Psychiatric Times, 12/92)




In the Courts:




Lilly Cleared in Scientology-linked Drug Suit



A Kentucky circuit court judge last fall dismissed a $150 million lawsuit against Eli Lilly & co., citing a lack of evidence that its drug fluoxetine (Prozac) caused Bonnie Leitsch, of Louisville, to attempt suicide in 1989. Lietsch, one of the drug’s most vocal critics, had appeared on a number of nationwide television programs, sometimes with a representative of the Church of Scientology, to criticize the drug. The Scientology-linked Citizens Commission on Human Rights has claimed that Prozac caused suicidal behavior, a charge denied by Eli Lilly and rejected by a Federal Food and Drug Administration advisory panel.



“Sadly,” according to an Eli Lilly statement, “[Leitsch] has been a victim of the disease of depression, the Scientologists, and her own lawyers, who repeatedly tried to withdraw from the case rather than try it.” In dismissing the suit, Judge Benjamin F. Shobe wrote in his order, “Although afforded ample opportunity, plaintiffs have presented no affirmative evidence showing there is a genuine issue of material fact.” Despite this finding, Leitsch filed an appeal.



To date, 39 similar Prozac-related suits have been dismissed, leaving about 100 still pending, according to a Lilly spokesman, who said there have also been 37 criminal cases in which defendants blamed their conduct on the effects of the drug. None of these defenses has been accepted by the courts. (From “Eli Lilly cleared in Prozac Lawsuit,” Psychiatric Times, 12/92)



Cult Observer, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1993



SSRI litigation - SEROXAT lawyer withdraws ....but how much did he keep in fees FIDDAMAN?

Funding also became an issue in the Seroxat Group Litigation Order (GLO). More than 500 claimants joined the GLO against pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline UK, alleging to have suffered withdrawal ­effects when reducing, discontinuing or attempting to discontinue use of the antidepressant Seroxat. It was ­alleged that such suffering amounted to personal injury.


http://www.thelawyer.com/cases-in-point/1010834.article


According to a lawyer close to the case the claimant numbers have fallen dramatically as a result of the withdrawal of legal aid. This was made particularly contentious ­because the firm used to represent the claimants, Cardiff-headquartered Hugh James, revised down the considered success of the case, forming the basis for the withdrawal of state funding.



It is understood that 125 claimants will continue to pursue the action but that they will be looking for a new law firm to represent them. Meanwhile, a group of the remaining claimants are appealing the Legal Services ­Commission’s decision to cancel the legal aid.



Prozac - Leitsch, a victim of her lawyer who repeatedly tried to withdraw, Scientology & CCHR - sound familiar FIDDAMAN?

“Sadly,” according to an Eli Lilly statement, “[Leitsch] has been a victim of the disease of depression, the Scientologists, and her own lawyers, who repeatedly tried to withdraw from the case rather than try it.” In dismissing the suit, Judge Benjamin F. Shobe wrote in his order, “Although afforded ample opportunity, plaintiffs have presented no affirmative evidence showing there is a genuine issue of material fact.” Despite this finding, Leitsch filed an appeal.



http://bobfiddaman.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/prozac-lilly-cleared-in-scientology.html


PROZAC - Lilly Cleared in Scientology-linked Drug Suit 1992 ...seems Maria Bradshaw missed this too FIDDAMAN

Lilly Cleared in Scientology-linked Drug Suit  





A Kentucky circuit court judge last fall dismissed a $150 million lawsuit against Eli Lilly & co., citing a lack of evidence that its drug fluoxetine (Prozac) caused Bonnie Leitsch, of Louisville, to attempt suicide in 1989. Lietsch, one of the drug’s most vocal critics, had appeared on a number of nationwide television programs, sometimes with a representative of the Church of Scientology, to criticize the drug. The Scientology-linked Citizens Commission on Human Rights has claimed that Prozac caused suicidal behavior, a charge denied by Eli Lilly and rejected by a Federal Food and Drug Administration advisory panel.







“Sadly,” according to an Eli Lilly statement, “[Leitsch] has been a victim of the disease of depression, the Scientologists, and her own lawyers, who repeatedly tried to withdraw from the case rather than try it.” In dismissing the suit, Judge Benjamin F. Shobe wrote in his order, “Although afforded ample opportunity, plaintiffs have presented no affirmative evidence showing there is a genuine issue of material fact.” Despite this finding, Leitsch filed an appeal.







To date, 39 similar Prozac-related suits have been dismissed, leaving about 100 still pending, according to a Lilly spokesman, who said there have also been 37 criminal cases in which defendants blamed their conduct on the effects of the drug. None of these defenses has been accepted by the courts. (From “Eli Lilly cleared in Prozac Lawsuit,” Psychiatric Times, 12/92)



Women form Prozac user support group - year 1990 ....how did Maria Bradshaw miss this?

SCIENTOLOGY CCHR LA instigates SSRI Prozac class action suits - how did CASPER Maria Bradshaw miss these FIDDAMAN?

FIDDAMAN set out to suppress concerns about SSRI other than SEROXAT - has his greed led to others suffering?

 
 
"In Seroxat we have one drug of a whole class. To play down it's side-effects is playing down the side-effects of every other SSRi. Seroxat is a celebrity, it's one that the media have got their fingers into. Once this celebrity is dead and gone they will move on to something else.
 
 
 
Then, and only then, will other SSRi's get the press coverage other advocates seem to be calling for"
 
 
http://fiddaman.blogspot.com/2009/08/seroxat-in-media.html

FIDDAMAN exclusive - PROZAC FDA hearings from 20 years ago - so how did Maria Bradshaw miss it?

Monday, 2 April 2012

Medsafe N Zealand PROZAC® Consumer Medicine Information - Suddenly stopping PROZAC warnings FIDDAMAN

PROZAC® - Medsafe www.medsafe.govt.nz/consumers/cmi/p/prozac.pdf


File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View

PROZAC® fluoxetine hydrochloride. Consumer Medicine Information. What is in this leaflet. This leaflet answers some common questions about PROZAC

 
  http://www.medsafe.govt.nz/consumers/cmi/p/prozac.pdf

Do not stop taking your medicine or lower the dosage without checking with your doctor. Suddenly stopping PROZAC may cause symptoms such as dizziness, anxiety, headache, feeling sick, or tingling or numbness of the hands or feet. Your doctor may want you to gradually reduce the amount of PROZAC you are taking before stopping completely.

Medsafe N Zealand PROZAC® Consumer Medicine Information - youth suicide warning, FIDDAMAN blog

[PDF]


PROZAC® - Medsafe www.medsafe.govt.nz/consumers/cmi/p/prozac.pdf


File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View

PROZAC® fluoxetine hydrochloride. Consumer Medicine Information. What is in this leaflet. This leaflet answers some common questions about PROZAC



http://www.medsafe.govt.nz/consumers/cmi/p/prozac.pdf


extract -

Keep all of your doctor’s appointments so that your progress can be checked.



The symptoms of depression or other psychiatric conditions may include thoughts of harming yourself or suicide. These symptoms may continue or get worse during the first one or two months of treatment until the full antiderpressant effect of PROZAC becomes apparent. This is more likely to occur in young adults under 25 years of age.

If you or someone you know is demonstrating any of the following warning signs, contact your doctor or a mental health professional right away or go to the nearest hospital for treatment:




worsening of your depression



thoughts or talk of death or suicide



thoughts or talk of self-harm or harm to others



any recent attempts at self-harm



increase in aggressive behaviour, irritability or any other unusual changes in behaviour or mood

All mentions of suicide or violence must be taken seriously.

Podcast with Casper's Maria Bradshaw - not so ** Exclusive FIDDAMAN via you tube






GSK GlaxoSmithKline interest in FIDDAMAN crude attempt to gag this blog

direct link to Bob Fiddaman attempt to gag this blog here -

http://chillingeffects.org/N/42559



see also - SoulfulSepulcher Twitter being used by Fiddaman ........it's all about control



http://bobfiddaman.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/soulfulsepulcher-twitter-being-used-by.html

GSK Andrew Witty - decided to settle long-standing litigation against the company - but not FIDDAMAN

When Andrew Witty moved the chief executive's suite down to the ground floor at GlaxoSmithKline's GSK -0.11%global headquarters four years ago, the company's new CEO served notice that his tenure running Britain's biggest drug maker would be one of change—lots of it.




"I wanted to be visible and accessible so that people could bounce ideas off me, raise issues with me, and trying to minimize the inhibitions to doing that," says Mr. Witty. "Secondly, it is extremely helpful for me to have a feel of how things are going. It just allows me to interact with more of the organization, and, of course, the beauty of that is I interact with people at every single level of the business, not just the senior directors."






Andrew Witty says Glaxo in recent years needed to adapt to a changing world where 'blockbuster' drugs were becoming rare.

.Mr. Witty immediately moved to address the issues he saw as needing urgent attention, launching a painful restructuring program and in the process cutting costs and unnecessary infrastructure, diversifying the company's product mix and jettisoning noncore activities.



He also decided to settle long-standing litigation against the company, notably in the U.S., paying massive legal charges tied to consumer lawsuits over diabetes drug Avandia, once the company's second-largest selling medicine, and a variety of other legal disputes involving its antidepressant Paxil.



"When I took over we had a series of substantial open litigation running against the company, for all sorts of different reasons, from the past, and I took a view that early resolution … was in the best interests of everybody concerned," Mr. Witty says. "I would much rather we were focused on developing our business, and focused on making sure we minimize future liabilities, than everybody spending their entire time looking backwards at things that happened 10 years ago."



GSK was formed in 2000 by the merger of GlaxoWellcome PLC and SmithKline Beecham PLC, creating the world's biggest drug maker at the time. Today, GlaxoSmithKline's pharmaceuticals arm develops, makes and markets drugs and vaccines, while its consumer-health division comprises oral care, over-the-counter medicines and nutritional healthcare and includes brands like pain-killer Panadol, Aquafresh toothpaste and the Lucozade energy drink.



Mr. Witty says Glaxo needed to adapt and respond to a changing world where "blockbuster" drugs generating more than $1 billion a year in sales were becoming rare and purchasers more reluctant to buy expensive medicines. The days of top-heavy, sprawling drug companies were numbered.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303404704577311412984146008.html

And the changes Mr. Witty has overseen at Glaxo have borne fruit. Britain's largest drug maker by sales and market capitalization is emerging from its "patent cliff" of drug patent expiries and expects to return to sales and margin growth this year, driven by Mr. Witty's diversification push, new products and expansion in emerging markets.



Analysts view it as one of the pharma sector's best investment prospects. "GlaxoSmithKline is one of the best-run companies in the sector, will deliver top-line growth and operational leverage and its overall risk profile is good compared to peers," was how Redburn analysts summed up the company in a recent note.



That resurgence under Mr. Witty allowed Glaxo last month to say it would invest more than £500 million, or about $800 million, and create as many as 1,000 manufacturing jobs in the U.K. at a new facility—the first new Glaxo manufacturing plant to be built in its home country in almost 40 years.



"It really takes me back to the two key things I want us to deliver: great sustainable innovation in health care, and access to medicines," Mr. Witty says.



"There are two things I want this company to be: one is a company that is able to do those two things, and once and for all demonstrate that you can do both things at once, and I think we have made progress on that.



"The second is that I want us to be the company that organically reinvents itself from the era of the 1990s pharmaceutical industry into whatever a vibrant pharmaceutical company will look like in the next 10 or 20 years. That is why I have been so adamant that we will not do large-scale M&A, because I want us to do this the hard way. I want us to reinvent ourselves from the inside out because I truly believe the company is capable of doing that."



The 47-year-old Mr. Witty says many of the changes he has introduced to Glaxo need to be embraced by the pharmaceuticals industry as a whole, for its own good and for the good of society. And, he says, those two objectives aren't mutually exclusive.



"I have made no secret of the fact that the industry and companies like GSK needed to work differently," he says. "My view was that the industry needed to do a lot to meet society, if you will, or its critics, at least halfway, and so that is what drives the internal change agenda at Glaxo—hence my focus on improving productivity of R&D, my focus on improving access to medicine in Africa and elsewhere, driving flexible pricing approaches in countries where that had not been seen before. Those are all dimensions of trying to change the behavior of the company."



Mr. Witty, who has been with Glaxo since 1985, is also president of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, a position he has held for two years.



In this dual capacity, Mr. Witty played a key role in coordinating and recently launching the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's eight-year program to fight tropical diseases. The initiative, announced in London at the end of January, recruited 13 major pharmaceutical companies to the project—a push to eliminate or control by 2020 10 tropical diseases that affect more than a billion people in poor countries. The promise commits pharma companies to pooling intellectual property to find the medicines to fight the diseases.



Mr. Witty is very proud of the pact and says it goes to the core of what he has been striving for since becoming Glaxo CEO in 2008. "What you have seen over the last four years is the roll-out of all of that thinking, where we said 'What can we do on intellectual property, this great bastion that could never be varied?'—but actually, of course, it can be varied, because we can have different approaches to IP, depending on different types of market situation."



The next area in which Mr. Witty is hoping to see R&D pooled is in developing new antibiotics to fight the rapidly evolving drug-resistance among microbes responsible for common infections, which threatens to turn them into untreatable diseases. The first line of defense against many infections, antibiotics take around 10-20 years to develop, and there are few in the pipeline. Only two new classes of antibiotics have been developed and launched in the past 30 years, and experts are worried that only a few big drug firms still have strong antibiotic R&D programs.



Last fall, the European Commission set out plans to boost research in antibiotics by helping small drug firms and promoting collaborative R&D between larger companies.



"We are trying to get ahead of the disaster.… Everybody has a concern that, one day, there might be a bug for which we don't have a drug," Mr. Witty says. "We don't want that day to happen, and we need to re-double our energies, and the way to do that is to acknowledge that the market has failed in this regard."



In the little free time he has, Mr. Witty tries to switch off by riding with his family. "When you are a CEO you think about the business every single waking second of your life," he says. "I wake up in the morning, GlaxoSmithKline; I go to bed at night, GlaxoSmithKline. It just is what comes with the job, so what the horse-riding does for me is just to force me to focus on something other."



Andrew Witty



Age: 47



Nationality: British



Position: CEO, GlaxoSmithKline



Based: Brentford, England



Time in job: Four years



Previous positions:



Jan. 2003-May 2008: president, GSK Pharmaceuticals Europe; 1985: Joined Glaxo. Held senior positions in Asia Pacific, South Africa, U.S.



Write to Sten Stovall at sten.stovall@dowjones.com



Andrew Witty



Age: 47



Nationality: British



Position: CEO, GlaxoSmithKline



Based: Brentford, England



Time in job: Four years



Previous positions: Jan. 2003-May 2008:

president, GSK Pharmaceuticals Europe;

1985: Joined Glaxo. Held senior positions

in Asia Pacific, South Africa, U.S.



Sunday, 1 April 2012

PANORAMA caused a shift away from SEROXAT FIDDAMAN crowed - could it have led to Littlehampton Prozac prescription?

THE devastated family of a grandfather who killed himself following a bad reaction to anti-depressants have urged doctors to warn patients of the possible side-effects before prescribing the drugs.


Brian Palmer, 63, shot himself in the head at his home in Horsham Road, after a nervous breakdown, in September.

The coroner at an inquest held last Wednesday (March 14) at Chichester concluded he took his own life following the prescription of anti-depressant pills.



Speaking after the hearing, Brian’s widow Jennifer, 62, appealed to doctors to take the time to explain to their patients all the possible side-effects of any drugs they prescribe.

She said: “I noticed a change in him almost straight after taking the pills. I asked to see the box in the days before but he said he couldn’t find it. I found it a few days after his death and it listed all the changes I had seen in him. My heart just stopped.

“I didn’t go down there with him, when he picked up the prescription – I wish I had.

“We have had to learn the hard way. I can’t bear to think of any other families going through this kind of trauma.”

The inquest heard that the self-employed electrician was a “worrier” and had previously had a breakdown more than 20 years ago.

As financial worries mounted, he visited his GP at the Fitzalan Medical Centre, in Fitzalan Road, Littlehampton, where he was given sleeping pill Zopiclone and the anti-depressant Fluoxetine.

The inquest heard how, days after Mr Palmer began taking the drugs, his mental health deteriorated.

Coroner’s officer Chris Clinch said Mrs Palmer became so concerned that she went to a neighbour’s home and called the police. Minutes later, Mr Palmer shot himself.

He was airlifted to the Royal London Hospital, in Whitechapel, where he was pronounced dead at 10.30am.

A post-mortem examination gave the cause of death as a single gunshot wound to the head.

Recording a narrative verdict, coroner Penelope Schofield said: “He took his own life following the prescription of the drug Fluoxetine and Zopiclone. It is clear he was a much-loved husband, father and grandfather.”

The coroner said she would be writing to the Fitzalan Medical Centre to advise GPs there to warn all patients of the potential side-effects any prescribed drug can have.

In a written statement to the Gazette, the family thanked all of those who had supported them.

They said: “September 30, 2011, will always remain a very dark day in all our lives and the period that has followed has been extremely difficult and painful for all who were close to Brian.

“We are relieved now to have the inquest firmly behind us so we can move forward with our lives whilst forever remembering Brian and the fantastic times we shared with him.

“Never will we forget the deep love he showed for all of us.”

Jennifer has urged anyone suffering from mental health problems, to contact MIND on 0300 123 3393 or visit www.mind.org.uk



Antidepressant dilemma - did SEROXAT litigation hype cause GP's to shift to citalopram, FIDDAMAN?

False dilemma From Wikipedia ..... when fallacy is used in an attempt to force a choice, FIDDAMAN style

False dilemma From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to: navigation, search A false dilemma (also called false dichotomy, the either-or fallacy, fallacy of false choice, black-and-white thinking, or the fallacy of exhaustive hypotheses) is a type of logical fallacy that involves a situation in which only two alternatives are considered, when in fact there is at least one additional option. The options may be a position that is between the two extremes (such as when there are shades of grey) or may be a completely different alternative.




False dilemma can arise intentionally, when fallacy is used in an attempt to force a choice (such as, in some contexts, the assertion that "if you are not with us, you are against us"). But the fallacy can also arise simply by accidental omission of additional options rather than by deliberate deception (e.g., "I thought we were friends, but all my friends were at my apartment last night and you weren't there").[citation needed]





In the community of philosophers and scholars, many believe that "unless a distinction can be made rigorous and precise it isn't really a distinction."[1] An exception is analytic philosopher John Searle, who called it an incorrect assumption which produces false dichotomies.[2] Searle insists that "it is a condition of the adequacy of a precise theory of an indeterminate phenomenon that it should precisely characterize that phenomenon as indeterminate; and a distinction is no less a distinction for allowing for a family of related, marginal, diverging cases."[2] Similarly, when two options are presented, they are often, though not always, two extreme points on some spectrum of possibilities; this can lend credence to the larger argument by giving the impression that the options are mutually exclusive, even though they need not be.[citation needed] Furthermore, the options in false dichotomies are typically presented as being collectively exhaustive, in which case the fallacy can be overcome, or at least weakened, by considering other possibilities, or perhaps by considering a whole spectrum of possibilities, as in fuzzy logic.[citation

SEROXAT - PANORAMA chose to ignore the other brands of SSRI - needed to fake FIDDAMAN litigation evidence?






4 .30 in Ed says - lets look at antidepressant story




4 45 Jofre says although problems with whole class of antidepressants we (bbc) decided to concentrate on Seroxat Why we narrowed down on Seroxat 1 because it was made by GSK 2 all the drugs in class cause suicidal thinking on dose change 3 Seroxat had a unique problem of withdrawal BECAUSE IT WAS LONGER ACTING … we decided to focus research into this drug



6.00 in - 40 min Panorama film took Shelley Jofre 8 months to make



6.10 in - It’s not something you do lightly WE WERE TAKING ON the worlds second largest drug company



Ban Seroxat... then start looking closely at the other SSRi's - says Bob Fiddaman



I never used to be in the camp of banning Seroxat but if one looks at the bigger picture you will see that it is the only way forward.



There is no benefit of Seroxat... and even if it could be argued that there was then the risks would far outweigh any benefit. When a drug is licensed by the MHRA the main focus on whether it is safe and effective is the risk/benefit ratio. Somewhere along the line we have been lied to - either that or we have a bunch of very incompetent people regulating the drugs you, I and our children take.





Ban Seroxat... then start looking closely at the other SSRi's. Glaxo are not the only pharmaceutical company who have been less than forthright with the truth.